Blog

AI -  chatbot. Artificial Intelligence  concept

TL;DR: If you’re stuck trying to “get started with AI”, here’s the clear path: choose one repeatable task, tighten the workflow behind it, apply a low-code tool that removes the slowest step and measure the gain within a week. This approach works to reduce risk and gives you a practical win that builds confidence and momentum across your team.<h2>Start by fixing the work, not choosing a tool</h2>Most AI attempts fail because the work underneath is unclear. People rush to tools, prompt them blindly and then blame the model when the output looks odd.&nbsp;Here is the truth: if the task is vague, AI will behave the same way.&nbsp;Strip the task back. Spell out the steps. Identify where time is wasted. Only then introduce AI. This will remove 80 percent of early 'failure.'Choose a task that meets three conditions: <ul><li>Repeated every day or every week </li><li>Boring enough that no one will complain if it changes </li><li>Safe enough that errors won’t cause harm </li></ul>If you meet these three criteria, you eliminate most of the risk while guaranteeing usability.&nbsp;Good examples include rewriting text, summarising long content, extracting actions from notes, producing first drafts or cleaning inconsistent data. These tasks succeed because they already follow patterns your team understands.<h2>Document the workflow in plain language</h2>Before AI touches anything, write down the workflow in five lines:<ol><li>The trigger </li><li>The inputs </li><li>The required output </li><li>The decision points </li><li>The bottleneck</li></ol>This takes ten minutes and will immediately show why previous AI attempts failed. AI doesn’t infer missing context. It needs structure. This gives it structure. Now, introduce AI at the bottleneck, not everywhere at once, people often try to automate the entire workflow at the start. That is a guaranteed way to stall.<blockquote>Find the single slowest, most repetitive step and place AI there. Nothing else.</blockquote><ul><li>If the bottleneck is rewriting, rewrite. </li><li>If it is summarising, summarise. </li><li>If it is cleaning text, clean text. </li><li>If it is extracting tasks, extract tasks.</li></ul>By narrowing the scope, you make the output reliable and the value obvious.<h2>Use low-code tools to remove manual steps quickly </h2>You don’t need developers to build value. Low-code tools let non-technical teams place AI inside workflows with minimal effort.&nbsp;A simple sequence works:<ol><li>Select the bottleneck </li><li>Build a prompt that matches the workflow </li><li>Run it on real work </li><li>Refine the inputs </li><li>Save the working pattern </li><li>Share it with the team</li></ol>This replaces hours of manual work with a repeatable action the team can trust.<h2>Measure the change immediately</h2>A pilot is only useful if you measure the right thing. Track:&nbsp;Time saved, Errors avoided, Clarity gained, Rework reducedDo this for one week. If the result improves, keep it. If not, adjust the workflow, not the tool.Scale by moving sideways, not upwards. When the first use case stabilises, expand to the next natural step in the same workflow.Meeting notes → project summaries Drafts → reports Data clean-up → categorisation Customer queries → triage notesBy moving sideways, the team learns one pattern at a time and confidence compounds.&nbsp;This is how capability compounds.&nbsp; Build capability before committing to bigger automation. Anyone can buy an AI tool. What matters is whether your team knows how to use it.Capability is built through:<ul><li>Clear workflows </li><li>Small wins </li><li>Safe pilots </li><li>Shared prompt libraries </li><li>Routine refinement</li></ul>Once these habits take hold, larger automation becomes obvious and low-risk. And importantly, you avoid buying tools you’re not ready to use.<h2>FAQ</h2>Q: What’s the first step if we feel overwhelmed? A: Choose one task. Not a workflow, not a department—one task.Q: How do we know if AI is helping? A: Track the time saved and the rework avoided. If both improve, you’re on the right path.Q: Why not start with a large project? A: Early mistakes are cheaper when the stakes are low. You learn faster and avoid damaging real work.Q: What skills do we need to start? A: Clear instructions, the ability to review outputs and a stable workflow. No coding required.Q: When should we escalate to deeper automation? A: When you have three or more stable use cases and the team can maintain them independently.If your business wants clarity on the right tasks, the right workflows and the right l<a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation">ow-code AI builds</a>, the <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI Fundamentals Masterclass</a>, <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp">AI Bootcamp </a>and <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-enterprise-strategy-roadmap" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-enterprise-strategy-roadmap" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary">AI Strategy Roadmap </a>give you the structure and support to introduce AI safely and with confidence.

The Easiest Way To Start Using AI In Your Business

Automation and Optimization of Business Processes with Gears

<h3>TLDR: Workflow automation isn’t about learning to code or rebuilding your systems. Make now pairs with AI to handle the repetitive work teams lose hours to every week. The AI cleans messy inputs, interprets unstructured text and keeps steps moving even when data isn’t perfect. This guide explains what AI-powered automation actually does, why it matters, and where to start if you want to remove the manual drag from your work.</h3><h2>What AI Changes in Everyday Workflows</h2>I see the same pattern everywhere. Work is &nbsp;fragmented.&nbsp;One task spans email, a form, a spreadsheet, a shared folder and a Teams message. None of it is difficult, but it slows you down because every piece lives in its own section.<blockquote>Automation exists to connect those worlds. AI exists to understand them.</blockquote>Put the two together and half the work you do today disappears.What AI Changes in Everyday Work I used to avoid automation tools because they were too brittle. If someone wrote their message differently or left out a field, the whole workflow collapsed. You’d spend more time fixing it than using it.&nbsp;AI shifts that. It reads the human input — the messy, unstructured version and turns it into something an automation tool like make.com, N8N or Zapier connected to AI can act on every time.&nbsp;<h2>How Make Works</h2>Make isn’t a coding tool. Although when you are still trying to get a scenario to run at 11pm, it can feel that way!&nbsp; No. It’s a visual builder. I drag blocks onto a canvas, connect them and decide what should happen when something triggers the flow.A trigger is the event: an email arrives, a row updates, a form is submitted. The steps are what I want to happen next: extract, classify, store, send, update, notify. The output is wherever the information needs to end up. Make handles the movement. AI handles the interpretation. I just describe the logic.<h2>How AI Fixes the Skitsy Workflow Problem</h2>Before AI, automations needed exact matches: exact phrasing, exact fields, exact formatting. One small variation and everything stalled.&nbsp;AI plugs that gap. It takes whatever shape the input arrives in, extracts the meaning and gives Make a clean, predictable structure.&nbsp;<h2>What This Looks Like&nbsp;</h2>Here’s what it looks like when you use Make with AI in the real world:<ul><li>You get a pile of customer emails every morning. AI extracts the relevant details, labels them and Make moves the information into the right place.</li><li>Your team fills out forms inconsistently. AI standardises the text, and Make stores it cleanly.</li><li>Reports that once took an afternoon of copy-paste now generate behind the scenes. </li></ul><h2>Why Make Works for Non-Technical Teams</h2>This is why I recommend Make to non-technical teams. You don’t rebuild your environment. You connect the tools you already use: email, spreadsheets, forms, docs, folders, CRMs. AI handles the parts humans are inconsistent with.&nbsp;If you can explain a process out loud, you can build it in Make. That’s seriously the threshold.<h2>FAQs</h2>Q: What does Make actually automate? A: Anything that involves moving information from one tool to another. Emails into sheets, form responses into folders, extracted text into tickets. Make carries the information so you stop acting as the middle layer. AI ensures the input is clean enough for the flow to keep running.Q: Do I need clean data before I start? A: No. That’s the entire point of pairing Make with AI. The AI tidies the input. You don’t preprocess anything. Start with the messy version — the workflow will survive it.Q: What if the workflow isn’t always identical? A: That’s fine. The steps can stay fixed while the content varies. AI handles the variation. Make handles the steps. As long as you know the logic, the flow holds.Q: How do I pick the workflow that will pay off fastest? A: Choose the one that interrupts you most often. Interruptions cost more than the task itself. Automating that single point of friction usually gives you the quickest win.Q: Will Make replace the tools we already use? A: No. It sits on top of them. Your CRM stays your CRM. Your sheets stay your sheets. Make links them so the manual glue-work disappears.Q: How long before I see actual value? A: Usually the same day. Basic flows take minutes to build once you know the steps. The gain comes from removing the constant rework that slows everything else down.Automation failed for most teams because it demanded perfection real work can’t offer. AI finally fixes that. It cleans the input, keeps workflows stable and removes the daily maintenance that made automation painful. When Make and AI work together, routine work stops being a drag and you get hours back without changing your tools.If you want help mapping your own workflows and turning them into live automations, join the <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation">No-Code/Low-Code AI Implementation Program</a>. We’ll turn your real processes into working automations that save hours.

Automate Your Workflows with AI in Make

Gen-En-Rate AI Concept and Use of Command Codes, System Control in Industry 5.0

<h3>TL;DR: You’ll learn how generative AI is changing real jobs today, the types of tasks it handles well, and what this means for teams who are still figuring out where to start. The point of this piece is simple: by understanding where AI already delivers clear value, you can make smarter decisions, reduce risk, and find practical entry points that build confidence.</h3><h2>What “generative AI at work” really means</h2>Generative AI isn’t abstract any more. It sits inside email clients, office tools, customer systems, research workflows, finance operations, and frontline work. Its job is to take dull, repeatable cognitive tasks and complete them in seconds.For beginners, the key shift is this: AI doesn’t replace roles outright. It reshapes the work inside them. The tasks you used to tolerate are now the tasks AI can handle.<h2>Where AI is helping people today</h2>The real value is in the small, daily tasks that quietly drain time. Across industries, the same pattern shows up.<ul><li>Admin-heavy roles: Professionals in HR, finance, legal, procurement and operations use AI to draft documents, summarise long threads, prepare briefs, and clean data. Work that once took an hour becomes a few minutes.</li><li>Customer-facing teams: Service teams use AI to triage issues, extract key details, produce first-draft replies, and generate summaries for handover. Consistency improves and no one starts from a blank page.</li><li>Creative and communications roles: Writers, marketers and educators use AI to generate variants, tighten structure, and rephrase content for different audiences.&nbsp; It helps them think, not just type.</li><li>Field and frontline work: Teams in hospitality, logistics, construction, health and retail use AI to capture notes, convert speech to structured records, flag key actions, and document events.Less paperwork, fewer errors, more time with customers.</li></ul>AI is slotting into workflows, not replacing them wholesale.<h2>Why teams feel the impact before they feel the change</h2>Most organisations don’t roll out “AI transformations”. They roll out lots of micro-shifts: emails drafted faster, meetings summarised reliably, reports structured neatly, data cleaned without manual rework.&nbsp;And that is the point.<h2>What this means for people learning AI today</h2>If you’re new to AI, here is the practical truth: you don’t need to chase complex use cases. The biggest gains come from improving the tasks you already do.Generative AI helps beginners:<ol><li>remove blank-page work </li><li>simplify messy writing </li><li>extract structure from noise </li><li>make decisions with clearer information </li><li>reduce rework and duplication </li></ol>These improvements raise confidence quickly and build capability without disrupting jobs.<h2>What organisations learn once they adopt AI </h2>Leaders notice three things early.1. Workflows become visible: AI exposes unclear processes immediately. If a process is vague, the output is vague. This forces teams to clean their workflows, which improves performance even without AI.2. Capability spreads horizontally: Once one person finds a prompt that works, others adopt it. Teams lift together rather than in isolated pockets.3. Managers rethink resource allocation: If admin shrinks, people move to higher-value tasks. This lifts productivity without adding headcount.&nbsp; So generative AI becomes less of a technology shift and more of an operating shift.<h2>How to choose your first AI use cases</h2>You need practical entry points.Start with tasks that are:<ul><li>high volume </li><li>low stakes </li><li>repeatable </li><li>painful to complete manually </li></ul>Think: emails, summaries, rewriting, research scans, drafting outlines, extracting tasks, cleaning data....basically a normal day for a white collar job....These are reliable starters for beginners becaue they build momentum without risk.<h2>Where the biggest gains appear after the basics</h2>Once basics settle, every sector sees a second wave of value.<ul><li>In professional services, AI supports research, analysis and scoping. </li><li>In education, it helps create resources and feedback frameworks. </li><li>In health and care, it simplifies documentation and reporting. </li><li>In government, it helps surface information from long records. </li><li>In corporate operations, it supports policy drafting, financial commentary and planning cycles.</li></ul>The pattern, even in these early days is eerily consistent: AI unlocks time, improves accuracy, and increases throughput. Once people see the first 10 or 20 use cases working, they want to know: <blockquote>“How far can this go?”</blockquote>The honest answer is this: it can go as far as your clarity, data quality and processes allow.Teams with clear workflows, basic governance and simple practice habits scale faster. Teams with messy processes, unclear ownership and no training stall quickly.&nbsp;AI rewards capability, not excitement.<h2>FAQ</h2>Q: Will generative AI replace jobs? A: It reshapes work before it replaces it. Most value appears in task reduction, not headcount reduction.Q: Do we need technical staff to start? A: No. Most early use cases rely on plain language and structured prompts, not technical builds.Q: How quickly should we expect results? A: Days. If you pick the right tasks, you’ll see measurable gains within the first week.Q: How do we avoid misuse or errors? A: Pair outputs with human review. Keep prompts clear. Build simple standards for accuracy and approval.Q: When should we invest in larger automation? A: After your team masters small, reliable tasks and you have evidence of consistent value.If you want clear guidance on identifying your first high-value use cases, improving team capability and moving from experiments to structured adoption, the <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI Fundamentals Masterclass</a>, <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp">AI Bootcamp</a>, and <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-enterprise-strategy-roadmap" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-enterprise-strategy-roadmap">AI Strategy Roadmap</a> give you the path, the methods and the support to do this safely and confidently.

How Generative AI Is Changing Daily Work

GEN AI Concept with Computer Code and Laptop

<h3>TLDR: ChatGPT and Claude both get called “AI assistants,” but they behave differently when you put them on real projects. ChatGPT is better when you need ideas, drafts, options, or momentum. Claude is better when you need structure, clarity, or steady analysis. If you know the difference, you stop forcing one tool to do the wrong job and the work gets easier. This article shows you how each model actually performs and how to choose the right one for whatever you’re working on.</h3><h2>The mistake most people make</h2>Most people try both tools the same way: same prompt, same expectation, same frustration. Then they assume one is “better” because it sounds more confident or writes longer answers. The problem is simpler. These systems were built with different statiscial instincts. Once you understand those instincts, the outputs make sense.<h2>What ChatGPT is built to do</h2>ChatGPT is built for movement. If you’re stuck, it gets you unstuck. If you have a rough idea, it shapes it. It doesn’t wait for a perfect brief. It tries to help you move forward with whatever you give it.When the work is creative, open-ended, exploratory or messy, it behaves like a fast collaborator. It gives you versions, rewrites, styles and angles without slowing you down. That’s why people reach for it when they need a draft or want to see what’s possible.<h2>What Claude is built to do</h2>Claude works differently. It’s calmer. It tries to keep things tidy and consistent. It doesn’t jump ahead. It wants clarity before it commits.When the work has rules, steps or a lot of detail, it holds the structure without drifting. It handles longer, denser content without losing the thread. It shows its working. It’s the model you use when the task needs reliability more than speed.<h2>How the difference shows up in real work</h2>Start a project in ChatGPT and you feel the pace. It fills gaps, offers ideas, reshapes your thinking and hands back something you can react to.&nbsp;Start the same project in Claude and you feel the stability. It breaks things down, checks assumptions and keeps the logic straight.&nbsp;Once you see that pattern, you stop comparing them and start using them deliberately.<h2>What this means for you</h2>Choosing the right model simply comes down to the type of work in front of you. Creative → ChatGPT. Structured → Claude.Most of our clients end up using both without realising it: ChatGPT to generate, Claude to check, then back to ChatGPT to format. It’s a natural back-and-forth once you stop expecting one tool to do everything.<h2>FAQs</h2>Q: If I only want to use one, which should I pick? Pick ChatGPT if you write often. Pick Claude if you work with long or complex information.Q: Why do they feel so different to use? ChatGPT pushes forward. Claude slows down. One fills space. The other avoids assumptions.Q: Can I use them together? Yes. It’s often the fastest way to get a polished output with minimal rework.Q: Do I need technical skills to choose the right one? No. Match the model to the job. That’s it.The difference between these two is practical. One gives you speed. One gives you clarity. If you match the model to the work, you make fewer revisions, waste less time and actually finish the task you started.If you want hands-on help learning how to use both tools inside your own workflows, join the <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary">5-Day AI Bootcamp. </a>By the end of the week you’ll know exactly when to reach for ChatGPT, when to reach for Claude and how to use both without overthinking it.

ChatGPT vs Claude: Pick the Right AI for Your Work

Corporate professionals crafting an AI prompt on a digital device, perfect for innovation, future tech, artificial intelligence training, language models, and smart assistants.

<h3>TL;DR: You’ll learn what prompt libraries are, why they matter for teams getting started with AI, and how to pick and use one without getting overwhelmed. If you’re beginning your AI journey, this guide shows how a library of prompts becomes a training tool, not just a list, and helps you build starting blocks of real skills.</h3><h2>What prompt libraries actually are</h2>A prompt library is a curated set of ready-to-use prompts organised by task or use case. For instance, the article lists libraries targeting tools like Anthropic Claude, ChatGPT and Google Gemini.&nbsp; Each prompt gives you a template for writing instructions that get reliable output from an AI. For beginners it means less guesswork, faster results, and early wins.<h2>Why this matters for beginners and teams</h2>When you’re new to AI, you risk spending hours tweaking prompts that barely work. A beginner-friendly library gives you scaffolding. It builds confidence. For teams, it promotes consistency. If everyone uses the same library or variant, outputs align, quality improves, onboarding gets smoother.To really to get your workflows going there are different tools and styles that span from developer to marketer needs. That diversity matters, but you only need one focused library when starting out.<h2>How to pick a useful prompt library</h2><ol><li>Clear focus: What tasks does it cover—marketing copy, meeting summaries, research briefings? The source article points out some libraries are marketing-heavy, others developer-centric. Geeky Gadgets </li><li>Adaptable structure: Good libraries document placeholders or templates so you can adjust context, tone, or audience. The article gives GitHub prompt banks as example. Geeky Gadgets </li><li>Beginner friendly: The fewer moving parts the better. If a library assumes deep prompt-engineering knowledge, skip for now. &nbsp;</li></ol>Follow this process:<ul><li>Choose one library relevant to your daily work (e.g., email summaries, content drafting). </li><li>Pick 2-3 prompts inside it. For each, break it down: what is the AI asked to do, what input it gets, what output format is expected. </li><li>Try the prompt. Review results. Adjust tone or audience until it aligns with your expectations. </li><li>Document the adjusted prompt in your team’s internal shared library. Make tweaks visible. </li><li>Make prompt use part of workflow so it isn’t an isolated experiment. This transforms a library from “just a folder” into a learning asset.</li></ul><h2>How to build your own team prompt library </h2>As you test prompts, build your internal version. Why is that important? Because external libraries are generic. They don’t know your style, process, or constraints.Your internal library should:<ol><li>Contain the prompts your team tested and refined. </li><li>Include notes on “what worked/why” so newcomers learn structure. </li><li>Link to real tasks your team completes (e.g., “Meeting minutes → summary &amp; action items”). </li><li>Be version-managed so when a prompt stops producing reliable results, you note it and retire or update it. </li><li>A refined internal library creates consistency and saves time for future team members.</li></ol><h2>What happens if you skip libraries or misuse them </h2>You’ll likely hit three issues:<ol><li>Trying 300 prompts at once: Overwhelmed, no time to learn. </li><li>Copy-paste without understanding: You get inconsistent output and low confidence. </li><li>Using a library without tying to tasks: The prompts sit idle. No skill develops. If your team ends up with a folder of random prompts nobody knows how to adjust, you’ve wasted the learning opportunity.</li></ol><h2>FAQ</h2>Q: Can a prompt library replace training or prompt-engineering skills? A: No. It lowers the barrier, but you still need to understand why prompts behave the way they do and how to tweak them.Q: How often should we refresh our library? A: At least quarterly. Models change, your tasks evolve. A prompt that worked six months ago might not fit the new context.Q: Do we need technical staff to manage a prompt library? A: Not necessarily. A prompt library focused on business tasks is fine for non-technical professionals. Technical staff help for advanced use cases.Q: What is a good size for a beginner library? A: Focus on 5-10 prompts that cover your core tasks thoroughly. Build depth before breadth.&nbsp; If you’re ready for hands-on guidance to pick the right prompt library, test prompts with your team, and build a custom internal library aligned to your workflows, the <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI Fundamentals Masterclass</a> and <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-readiness-assessment" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-readiness-assessment">AI Readiness Assessment</a> are built exactly for that work

How Prompt Libraries Speed Your AI Learning Curve

LLM, AI Large Language Model concept, Businessman use smartphone and application general-purpose language generation capability, Chat AI, Automation, Machine learning, Big Data analysis Document

<h3>TLDR:Most people pick AI tools like they’re choosing toothpaste — whatever’s trending or looks shiny. Then they complain when it doesn’t “get” them or makes a confident mess of their work.The problem isn’t AI. It’s fit. Each platform has a different purpose, strength, and ceiling. Once you know what each one actually does well, you stop forcing the wrong tool into the wrong job and start getting real value.</h3>If you’ve tried ChatGPT, you’ve probably also tried one of its cousins and wondered why they all give slightly different answers. Each AI system was built for a specific type of interaction, from creative brainstorming to legal analysis. Understanding that saves hours of trial, error, and subscription regret.<h2>ChatGPT – The All-Rounder That Does (Almost) Everything</h2>ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, is the most versatile of the bunch. It handles writing, coding, research, and analysis with surprising coherence. You can feed it text, images, or even audio, and it’ll respond in kind. Its plugin ecosystem and memory features mean it can recall context over time, automate tasks, and even simulate a personalised assistant.When to use it:Use ChatGPT when you need multimodal capabilities — text, images, code, or voice — and when you want to automate thinking-heavy but repeatable work. It’s built for brainstorming, content creation, research, data analysis, and light coding.Practical use cases:<ul><li>Writing reports, blog posts, or marketing material. </li><li>Summarising research or drafting complex proposals. </li><li>Automating customer emails or internal updates. </li><li>Debugging or generating code snippets. </li></ul>Strengths:<ul><li>Industry-leading support for text, image, and voice inputs. </li><li>Expanding plugin ecosystem with thousands of third-party integrations. </li><li>Adaptive tone, capable of handling creative or technical work equally well. </li><li>Memory (on premium plans) that lets it remember your style or context. </li></ul>Weaknesses:<ul><li>Key features like memory, plugins, and GPT customisation are paywalled. </li><li>Accuracy dips in niche or highly technical domains. </li><li>Overconfidence: it will answer every question, even when it shouldn’t. </li></ul>Best practice tip:Create a custom GPT for your business or workflow with explicit instructions and a private knowledge base. It’s the difference between a one-size-fits-all assistant and one that actually understands your work.<h2>Gemini – The Workspace Native</h2>If you live in Gmail, Docs, or Sheets all day, Gemini is the AI that sits quietly inside your browser and finishes your sentences before you do. Developed by Google, it’s less about creativity and more about productivity. Its strength lies in real-time collaboration, document handling, and integration with everything in Google’s ecosystem.When to use it:When you need live access to files, data, and shared documents. It shines during group projects, report writing, and data prep, where multiple people need context at once.Practical use cases:<ul><li>Drafting and editing Docs collaboratively. </li><li>Summarising Gmail threads or attachments. </li><li>Building data-driven Sheets or presentations. </li><li>Managing projects or tasks across Workspace tools. </li></ul>Strengths:<ul><li>Tight integration with Drive, Calendar, and Gmail. </li><li>Real-time internet access and fact updates via Google Search. </li><li>Handles text, images, and data tables in one interface. </li><li>Excellent for asynchronous collaboration and version control. </li></ul>Weaknesses:<ul><li>Limited usefulness outside the Google ecosystem. </li><li>Some features remain experimental or inconsistently reliable. </li><li>Slower performance with large or complex documents. </li></ul>Best practice tip:Use Gemini directly inside Docs or Sheets. Avoid switching tabs to external tools, it’s built to make Google users faster, not to replace standalone LLMs.<h2>Claude – The Long-Form Thinker</h2>Claude, from Anthropic, focuses on reasoning, clarity, and safety. It’s less about personality and more about precision. Claude can read, process, and summarise extremely long documents — entire policy drafts, legal contracts, or academic papers — while maintaining factual consistency.When to use it:Use Claude when you need an AI that can digest complexity without cutting corners. It’s built for research, policy, and compliance — anywhere you need your words to stand up to scrutiny.Practical use cases:<ul><li>Analysing 100-page reports or tender documents. </li><li>Drafting defensible policy papers or governance reviews. </li><li>Extracting key insights from academic or technical research. </li><li>Simplifying dense material for public or internal audiences. </li></ul>Strengths:<ul><li>Can handle 200k+ tokens of context (far longer than most AIs). </li><li>Excellent reasoning, logic, and ethical restraint. </li><li>Consistent tone — calm, structured, and clear. </li><li>Reliable for high-stakes content that needs accuracy. </li></ul>Weaknesses:<ul><li>No visual or audio capability. </li><li>Tone can feel formal or overly cautious. </li><li>Less useful for creative or fast-moving content. </li></ul>Best practice tip:Use Claude to review or simplify complex material. It’s ideal when accuracy matters more than speed or personality.<h2>Grok – The Real-Time Commentator</h2>Built by X (Twitter), Grok’s superpower is immediacy. It’s tuned for live data, trending topics, and cultural moments. Instead of perfect paragraphs, it produces fast, conversational takes that sound human — because it’s drawing from the same real-time feeds people are reacting to.When to use it:When you need quick commentary, summaries of live events, or trend-based content that sounds current. It’s the tool for social-first brands, journalists, and community managers.Practical use cases:<ul><li>Monitoring brand mentions or industry chatter. </li><li>Creating on-brand posts for social media. </li><li>Writing witty replies or summaries of breaking news. </li><li>Tracking sentiment and emerging public conversations. </li></ul>Strengths:<ul><li>Direct access to X’s live data. </li><li>Engaging, informal writing style that fits social tone. </li><li>Fast and context-aware in real time. </li><li>Great for audience engagement and reactive content. </li></ul>Weaknesses:<ul><li>Limited to the X ecosystem. </li><li>Not built for structured or analytical tasks. </li><li>Early-stage toolset compared to other major platforms. </li></ul>Best practice tip: Use Grok to track or respond to conversations as they happen. It’s a tone tool, not a research engine.<h2>Perplexity – The Verified Researcher</h2>Perplexity feels like the adult in the room and is hands down our favourite at <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au">AI Strategy Consulting</a>. Every claim it makes comes with a source. It combines real-time web results with concise synthesis, so you get short, citation-linked answers you can trust.When to use it:When accuracy and traceability are non-negotiable — compliance reports, academic writing, or any work that will be externally reviewed.Practical use cases:<ul><li>Fact-checking or summarising across multiple sources. </li><li>Creating annotated bibliographies or research briefs. </li><li>Replacing traditional search with verified synthesis. </li><li>Reviewing competing claims or policy arguments. </li></ul>Strengths:<ul><li>Every output links to its sources. </li><li>Combines live search with structured summarisation. </li><li>Reduces hallucination risk through evidence retrieval. </li><li>Balanced tone suitable for professional outputs. </li></ul>Weaknesses:<ul><li>Limited creative or narrative flexibility. </li><li>Dependent on web data quality. </li><li>Not suitable for marketing or tone-based writing. </li></ul>Best practice tip:Use Perplexity when you need credible evidence, not personality. It’s your best option for research, due diligence, or compliance tasks.DeepSeek – The Efficient WorkhorseDeepSeek, developed in China, is the quiet performer. It’s optimised for technical workloads and efficiency at scale. While Western tools chase creativity and UX, DeepSeek focuses on speed, cost, and multilingual capabilities, particularly for enterprises handling large data volumes or coding tasks (security concerns pending).When to use it:When you need reliable, affordable compute power for technical work, or when your project involves multiple languages or heavy data processing.Practical use cases:<ul><li>Generating or debugging code in various languages. </li><li>Running large AI workloads or analytical tasks. </li><li>Translating or localising content efficiently. </li><li>Supporting internal technical teams at scale. </li></ul>Strengths:<ul><li>High performance for coding and data tasks. </li><li>Significantly cheaper than Western models. </li><li>Lightweight, fast, and scalable for enterprise use. </li><li>Effective for multilingual workloads. </li></ul>Weaknesses:<ul><li>Limited ecosystem and developer support outside Asia. </li><li>Less capable in creative or conversational tasks. </li><li>Lower visibility globally, so fewer integrations. </li></ul>Best practice tip: Use DeepSeek when you need scale without breaking the budget. It’s best suited to technical teams, not content creators.&nbsp;If you look closely, these six tools represent different layers of the AI stack:<ol><li>ChatGPT covers breadth and creativity.</li><li>Gemini handles collaboration and productivity.</li><li>Claude ensures accuracy and reasoning.</li><li>Grok captures live social context.</li><li>Perplexity manages verification and sourcing.</li><li>DeepSeek delivers scalable technical execution.</li></ol>Together, they map the full range of what LLMs can do today from imagination to implementation. The key is matching capability to context.<h2>&nbsp;FAQ</h2>Q: Which one should I start with? A: ChatGPT. It’s the most accessible and has the broadest capability for general use.Q: Which is safest for work that could go public or legal? A: Claude. It prioritises accuracy, ethics, and reasoning depth.Q: Which integrates best with existing tools? A: Gemini, if you’re deep in Google Workspace. Otherwise, ChatGPT for custom workflows.Q: Which one can actually cite its sources? A: Perplexity. It’s built to show where information comes from, not just summarise it.Q: Which tool handles multilingual or technical data best? A: DeepSeek. It’s designed for performance and scalability.Q: What’s the best combo to use together? A: ChatGPT for creation, Perplexity for verification, and Claude for analysis. That trio covers 90% of business use cases.

Which AI Platform Should You Use?

AI strategy consulting