Blog

Businessman using AI agents to automate document management and data workflow across digital systems, showing smart process optimization.

<h3>TL;DR In January 2025, OpenAI released ‘Tasks’, a feature that allows ChatGPT to schedule reminders and recurring actions. This shifts the tool from a reactive search engine to a proactive assistant. While useful for reducing administrative noise, it remains in beta. We explain how the feature works and how to test it without risking reliability.</h3><h2>The Limit of On-Demand AI </h2>Most organisations use generative AI as an on-demand service. The user types a prompt, the model provides an answer and the interaction ends.This creates a dependency on human memory. If a manager forgets to ask for a report, the report is not generated. The friction of initiating the task often outweighs the benefit of the automation.This limitation keeps AI in the role of a consultant rather than an assistant. It can solve problems, but it cannot manage a workflow.<h2>How the January 2025 Update Works </h2>The ‘Tasks’ feature began rolling out on January 14, 2025. It is designed to help users automate one-off or recurring actions.It is currently available to paid subscribers on Plus, Team and Pro plans. To access it, users select “4o with scheduled tasks” from the model interface.The mechanism is straightforward. You provide a specific instruction and a timeframe. You might ask for a daily summary of industry news at 7:00 AM, or a reminder to draft a weekly status email every Friday.The system manages these requests in a dedicated list. Users can view, edit or delete items. When the scheduled time arrives, the system sends a notification to your desktop or mobile app.<h2>The Shift to Agentic Assistants </h2>This release is part of a broader move toward "agentic" AI.A chatbot waits for input. An agent acts independently based on prior instructions. While the current version is limited to simple scheduling, it establishes the infrastructure for autonomy.We expect this to evolve quickly. Future iterations will likely move beyond simple reminders to executing complex loops—such as searching for information, summarising it and emailing it to a team member without human intervention.For now, it is a scheduled script. It follows a rote set of instructions. This makes it useful for repetitive, low-value work that distracts staff from deeper thinking.<h2>Managing Risk in Beta Features&nbsp;</h2>The primary risk with autonomous tasks is reliability.When a human manages a calendar, they understand the consequence of a missed meeting. When a beta software feature manages a calendar, it lacks that context.We have seen early demonstrations of agentic AI fail to trigger or produce inaccurate data.Organisations must distinguish between "convenience" and "criticality". If a task must happen for the business to function—such as payroll, client deliverables or compliance checks: do not give it to ChatGPT yet. Stick to established enterprise software.If the task is helpful but optional, such as daily brainstorming prompts—it is a safe candidate.A Protocol for Safe Implementation We advise against rolling this out to an entire team immediately. Instead, follow this protocol to test the capability safely.1. Identify the Administrative Noise:&nbsp; Look for tasks that are repetitive, simple and purely digital. Good examples include checking a public website for updates or summarising a specific document daily.2. Run Parallel Systems:&nbsp; Do not turn off your existing reminders. Set the task in ChatGPT, but keep your standard calendar notification active. This allows you to verify that the AI triggers correctly without the risk of missing the deadline.3. Verify the Output Quality: If the task involves generating text, review the quality for one week. Check for hallucinations or missed context. Automation is only valuable if the output is accurate.4. Expand to Low-Risk Delegation: Once the pattern is proven, you can rely on the notification. However, keep the scope limited. Use the 10-task limit to focus on high-frequency, low-risk items that clear mental space.<h2>Why AI Oversight Remains Essential </h2>The goal of this technology is to reduce friction, not to remove responsibility.A manager is still responsible for the output, regardless of who—or what—produced it. As we introduce these tools into daily workflows, the role of the operator shifts from "doing the work" to "reviewing the work".Competence involves knowing when to automate and when to intervene. We help teams build the judgment to make that distinction.<h2>FAQ </h2>Q: Does this replace our project management software? No. Dedicated tools like Asana or Jira are designed for complex dependencies and accountability. ChatGPT Tasks is for personal productivity loops and simple reminders. It lacks the structure to manage team-wide projects.Q: How do we prevent staff from over-relying on it? Set clear boundaries. Define "critical path" work that must remain in formal systems. Encourage the use of AI for personal organisation, but not for official business record-keeping or strict compliance deadlines.Q: What happens if the system goes down? This is a cloud-based feature. If OpenAI experiences an outage, the notification will likely fail. This is why we advise against using it for time-sensitive or mission-critical actions.Q: Is data shared with the model used for training? By default, interactions in ChatGPT may be used for training unless you are on an Enterprise plan or have opted out in settings. Be cautious about scheduling tasks that include sensitive client data or proprietary metrics.Q: Should we mandate this for our team? No. Allow competence to grow through experimentation. Let a few "champions" test the feature and share their results. Mandating a beta tool often creates frustration rather than efficiency.If your organisation wants practical guidance on how to automate routine work, reduce manual prompting and build reliable agents without confusion, our <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary">No Code and Low Code AI </a>solutions give your team a structured way to scale efficiency and capability.

How to Use ChatGPT for Admin Tasks

Human and robot hands forming a heart shape together. AI and human collaboration concept

<h3>TL;DR: We help organisations adopt AI in a way that reduces confusion, keeps people in control and avoids the fear that usually stops progress. Most teams already use AI without realising it. When you make the work clearer, explain what AI actually does, support competence, protect autonomy and guide managers through their role, adoption becomes simple. This guide lays out the full framework we use to help organisations start, scale and embed AI in everyday work.</h3><h2>Why AI Adoption Fails</h2>Most adoption failures have little to do with technology. They come from uncertainty. People don’t know what AI does, assume it replaces judgment or believe it requires technical capability they don’t have. They also underestimate how much AI they use already. That gap creates hesitation. We address these issues before introducing any tool because adoption only works when people feel informed, supported and in control.<h2>What AI Can and Cannot Do</h2>We begin with a clear distinction.AI performs well when a task is repetitive, structured or data-heavy. It identifies patterns, reduces manual effort and speeds up analysis. It does not replace judgment, context or the human decisions that sit around those tasks. This clarity helps teams understand where AI fits.&nbsp;Once people see that AI reinforces their capability instead of removing their role, the resistance drops quickly. It reframes AI as a support mechanism, not a threat.AI adoption is not driven by features. It is driven by how people experience the change. Three factors matter.1. Competence/Confidence People want to feel effective in their work. AI helps by removing repetitive tasks, reducing errors and giving teams more time for decisions that require context.2. Autonomy People use AI more confidently when they stay in control. When they can question, adjust or override AI outputs, they see the system as support rather than supervision.3. Relationships AI improves coordination when it helps teams communicate clearly, hand off tasks smoothly and avoid unnecessary rework. When the workflow becomes easier, collaboration improves.When AI strengthens these three areas, adoption moves well and AI fluency follows.<h2>The Barriers We Address in Early Stages </h2>We encounter consistent barriers across organisations:<ol><li>Unconscious use: Many teams already rely on AI within standard tools but don’t identify it as AI. Once this is explained, the fear of the unknown fades.</li><li>Awareness: People often struggle to see the value AI provides. We make this visible early so teams recognise the benefit to their daily work.</li><li>Trust: Trust comes from clarity. People need to know what the model does, how the output is reviewed and how they stay responsible for the final decision. When trust is established deliberately, usage increases.</li></ol>These barriers are predictable and controllable. Address them early and adoption becomes a normal part of work, not a disruptive change.<h2>Why Managers are Key to AI Adoption Success&nbsp;</h2>Managers shape the environment where AI is used. When they use AI themselves, support experimentation and normalise questions, adoption increases. When they avoid the tools or treat AI as optional, usage drops immediately.We work with managers to:<ul><li>use AI in their own workflow </li><li>give teams time to test and learn </li><li>remove pressure while people build confidence </li><li>reinforce that AI supports competence, not compliance </li></ul>Successful adoption always has managers who set clear expectations and model the behaviour themselves.<h2>8 Quick Steps to AI Adoption</h2>This is a jumpstart method we use to help organisations adopt AI safely and predictably.1. Understand what AI can and cannot do: We start by clarifying where AI is useful and where human judgment remains essential. This removes assumptions and reduces fear.2. Start with familiar tools: We build confidence by showing teams the AI they already use. Familiarity lowers resistance and makes new workflows easier to accept.3. Identify business challenges: We look for repetitive work, slow processes and avoidable errors. These areas give people immediate relief and clear improvement.4. Start small and scale strategically: We choose a simple, low-risk pilot with stable workflows and measurable outcomes. Early success matters more than ambition.5. Build trust through transparency: We explain what the tool does, how outputs are reviewed and how staff stay in control. Trust grows when people understand the system.6. Empower employees with training and support: We use short, practical sessions where teams test tools, ask questions and see the benefit firsthand. This removes uncertainty.7. Create a culture of continuous learning and collaboration: We break silos early so AI supports entire workflows instead of isolated pockets. Collaboration increases the impact of any tool.8. Measure results and build momentum: We track time saved, accuracy gains and satisfaction. Once results are clear, we share them across the organisation to build confidence for the next project.This sequence works because it treats AI as a practical tool rather than a technical initiative. Did you have to learn to use the internet? Learn to use a mobile phone? A dishwasher, washing machine?AI Can Strengthen Culture&nbsp; Okay, that is a big statment. But, when AI increases competence, protects autonomy and improves coordination, people use it willingly. The work becomes clearer, errors reduce and teams collaborate more effectively. Adoption becomes part of the workflow, not an ongoing project or once off pilot imposed from above.We see this repeatedly: once the environment supports AI, the technology stops feeling disruptive and starts feeling ....kinda....useful.<h2>FAQ</h2>Q: How do we know if we’re ready for AI? If your teams deal with repetitive, structured or error-prone tasks, you’re ready. Most organisations start earlier than they expect.Q: How do we avoid overwhelming staff? Use familiar tools, give people time to test and avoid technical explanations. Confidence grows through experience, not instruction.Q: Do we need technical capability at the start? No. You need clarity, a real problem to solve and a simple pilot.Q: What makes a good first use case? A small, stable task where improvement is easy to measure and disruption is minimal.Q: How do we scale beyond the pilot? Share results early, bring managers into the process and remove silos so AI supports broader workflows.&nbsp; If your organisation wants practical guidance on how to adopt AI safely, identify the right <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary">use cases</a> and build no-code and low-code solutions without confusion, our <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI Fundamentals Masterclass</a> gives your team a structured way to build confidence and capability from day one.

A Beginner’s Guide to Using AI at Work

AI Artificial Intelligence Regulation Legislation Copyright Infringement Law

<h3>TL;DR: Many teams avoid AI because they can’t see how an answer was produced. This article explains explainability in plain language, why it matters for everyday work and how to bring it into your organisation without needing technical skills. If you want AI that your team can check, defend and rely on, this is the part to focus on.</h3><h2>Why explainability matters before anything else</h2> When I meet people trying to introduce AI into their organisation, one issue appears more than any other. People don’t reject AI because of the technology. They reject it because they can’t tell whether an answer is reliable. And when a result affects a customer, a staff member or a decision that carries risk, that uncertainty becomes a big problem.People want AI they can examine. They want to know what information shaped the output. They want to know why it reached that conclusion. They want to know whether they can justify it when someone asks questions.Explainability gives them that visibility. It replaces guesswork with a simple way to understand the system’s behaviour. This is what actually makes adoption possible, because people will only really adopt AI when they trust the outcome.<h2>What AI explainability means</h2>Explainability is often spoken about in technical language, but the idea is straightforward.It means being able to understand:<ul><li>what information the system used </li><li>how it interpreted that information </li><li>why it produced the answer you see </li></ul>You’re not trying to inspect algorithms. You’re trying to make sure the path from input to output is visible. If your team can follow that path, they can make decisions around the results. If they can’t, they will avoid the tool or double-check everything manually, which defeats the purpose of using AI in the first place.This matters because AI is now used to support judgments in hiring, customer service, financial commentary, compliance reviews, analysis and planning. These are areas where people routinely ask why a certain outcome was produced.If your only answer is “the model generated it”, the system will lose credibility quickly. When people can’t explain a decision, they protect themselves by stepping out of the process. This is where adoption will stall.<ul><li>Explainability prevents that slide into uncertainty. </li><li>It gives leaders a clear way to validate how decisions were formed. </li><li>It supports staff who need to show their working. </li><li>It avoids situations where the AI becomes a black box that sits outside oversight.</li></ul><h2>What explainability looks like&nbsp;</h2>Most organisations need a practical version of explainability, not a technical one. In simple terms, an explainable system allows you to:<ol><li>see the information that influenced the result </li><li>understand the steps the system took </li><li>confirm whether the reasoning makes sense </li><li>check that similar inputs receive similar treatment </li><li>recreate the decision when required </li></ol>This level of clarity helps reduce errors and gives teams confidence to use the system in work that matters. It also supports leaders who need to defend decisions to boards, risk committees or external reviewers.&nbsp;&nbsp; The main issues I see have nothing to do with the model itself. They come from gaps in process and governance.&nbsp;Some teams introduce AI without defining what a “good” explanation looks like. Others don’t make clear which decisions require explainability. Some teams rely on outputs without linking them to evidence. Others assume staff will review results, but never train them to do it properly.These gaps create inconsistency. They also create an avoidable risk. Explainability fills them by giving you a single way to review, check and defend AI-supported decisions.<h2>How to bring AI explainability into your organisation</h2>Here is the practical path that works across non-technical teams.<ul><li>Start by identifying the decisions where explainability is essential. These are usually decisions involving people, money, customers or compliance. </li><li>Once you know where explainability matters, define what “good” output looks like. This includes clarity, consistency and a visible link to evidence. </li><li>Choose systems that show their working, not systems that produce answers without context. </li><li>Keep human review around decisions that carry consequences. </li><li>Record how decisions were made so they can be reviewed or audited later. </li><li>Finally, train people to check outputs in a simple, consistent way. Most of the value comes from giving teams a repeatable structure for reviewing results.</li></ul>This approach creates confidence without adding technical complexity. It also reduces the friction that often comes with introducing new tools.&nbsp;When organisations have this capability in place, adoption becomes smoother because people understand how the system behaves.<h2>FAQ:&nbsp;</h2>Q: How do we decide which decisions need the strictest explainability? Focus on decisions with human, financial or regulatory consequences.Q: Who owns explainability inside the organisation? Usually risk or governance, supported by the operational owner of the workflow.Q: What does “good evidence” look like? A clear link between inputs, the source documents and the output that was produced.Q: How do we train teams to review AI outputs properly? Give them a standard process: check evidence, check consistency, check alignment with policy and confirm the logic.Q: What triggers a review or escalation? Any output that looks inconsistent, unclear or out of pattern in a high-impact workflow.<h2>How we support organisations that need this </h2>We’re certified<a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-iso-42001-aims-certification" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-iso-42001-aims-certification"> ISO 42001 Auditors</a>. We can set up and assess, align and certify your <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-iso-42001-aims-certification" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-iso-42001-aims-certification" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary">AI governance practices</a> under the global standard for responsible AI. Whether you're embedding LLMs, deploying AI products or automating internal workflows, we get you audit-ready and support you through the full certification process.You receive:<ul><li>A full Assessment aligned to ISO/IEC 42001 requirements </li><li>A Gap Analysis across all Annex A control categories </li><li>A tailored Roadmap to reach audit readiness </li><li>A Board Summary for risk committees, executive teams or investors </li><li>Certification Guidance and audit preparation aligned to external certification bodies</li></ul>

What Explainable AI Means at Work

Retrieval-Augmented Generation RAG. Semantic search for enterprise internal documents.

<h3>TL;DR: Most leaders want AI that can handle the real work inside their organisation, not generic tools that guess. This article explains, in simple terms, how a contextual AI platform reads your documents, retrieves the right information and produces accurate answers your team can trust. If you’re unsure how to introduce AI without technical expertise, this is the safest and most practical way to start.</h3><h2>Why accuracy matters more than “smart AI”</h2>In every organisation I work with, the problem is the same. It isn’t that teams lack ideas for using AI. It’s that they don’t trust the answers. And when it comes to GenAI, lets by honest...you really should'nt.They’ve tried general tools. They’ve seen confident but wrong responses. They’ve watched teams lose interest because the output wasn’t usable.This is the real barrier to adoption.People want AI that understands their work, not just language, not just patterns, but the specific information buried in reports, policies, spreadsheets, emails, customer feedback transcripts, meeting notes and technical documentation.<blockquote>That’s where contextual AI platforms enter.</blockquote>They don’t try to be universally clever. They focus on grounding answers in your actual data so the information is correct, repeatable and safe enough to rely on.<h2>A practical explanation: what contextual AI does</h2>A contextual AI platform solves three everyday problems:<ul><li>Your information is scattered. </li><li>Your documents are long and inconsistent. </li><li>Your teams waste time searching for answers.</li></ul>The platform addresses this by doing something simple but powerful: it reads everything you give it, stores it in one place and retrieves the right parts when someone asks a question.You don’t need to understand the underlying mechanics. You do need to understand the outcomes.&nbsp;Here’s the plain-English version of how it works.It ingests your information, not the internet scrape of a ChatGPT.&nbsp; Because every organisation has:<ul><li>PDFs, reports and slide decks </li><li>Spreadsheets and databases </li><li>Content in SharePoint, Google Drive, Slack, GitHub and internal systems </li></ul>The platform pulls all of this in automatically. It extracts text, tables, images and diagrams, then stores everything in a central datastore.This removes the daily frustration your teams face:“Where is the latest version?” “Which folder is it in?” “Who updated this last?” Once ingested, the AI can genuinely “read” your organisation’s work instead of relying on assumptions.It retrieves the right information before generating an answer. And so the biggest shift comes from how the platform answers questions.&nbsp;Instead of guessing, it retrieves evidence from your datastore first. This is the core idea behind RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) but for non-technical folks, the only concept that matters is this:<blockquote>The AI checks your information before it replies.</blockquote>If the first search doesn’t have enough detail, it searches again. It uses different retrieval methods to avoid missing anything important. It then picks the most relevant sections so the answer is grounded in fact.This removes the behaviour that erodes trust: general tools “sound right” even when they’re wrong.&nbsp;Here, accuracy is the baseline.<h2>It generates grounded, evidence-based responses</h2>Once the right evidence is retrieved, the AI produces a clean answer that your team can act on.&nbsp;The safeguards are clear:<ol><li>It only uses information from your documents </li><li>It shows exactly where each statement came from </li><li>It flags parts that may need human review </li><li>This is essential in regulated teams or decision-heavy roles. </li><li>There’s no guesswork and no hidden reasoning. </li><li>Your team can verify every claim instantly.</li></ol>The key benefits are that:<ul><li>It stays current as your organisation changes </li><li>Your information changes constantly. </li><li>Policies are updated. </li><li>Reports are revised. </li><li>New documents appear every week.</li></ul>The platform can ingest new content automatically, so the AI works with accurate and current information. This keeps the system reliable without creating extra work for your teams. It meets enterprise security expectations for organisations handling sensitive or regulated information, this matters, because you get:<ul><li>Role-based access </li><li>Encryption </li><li>Audit trails </li><li>Cloud, VPC or on-prem deployment </li></ul>This means AI adoption can proceed without compromising privacy, compliance or security.<h2>What this means for your organisation</h2>If you’re leading a non-technical team and trying to adopt AI safely, this is the simplest guidance:Start with the information your team already relies on. Choose one problem where accuracy matters. Let the platform handle complexity you don’t need to touch. Measure the improvements in search time, accuracy and consistency.<h2>FAQ</h2>Q: Do I need engineers to use something like this? A: No. You choose the use case and provide the content. The platform handles the technical components.Q: What if our documents are messy? A: The system extracts structure automatically. Mixed formats are expected.Q: How do I decide if this is right for us? A: If your team spends time searching, rewriting or answering repeated questions, it’s worth exploring.Q: How does this reduce AI risk? A: Every answer is grounded in your evidence, not guesses. You get visibility into sources and audit trails.Q: When is a platform like this unnecessary? A: If your work is simple, low-risk or doesn’t rely on documentation, smaller tools are fine.&nbsp; If your organisation wants practical guidance on how to adopt AI safely, identify the right use cases and build no-code and low-code solutions without confusion, our <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation">No-Code and Low-Code Implementation,</a> <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI Fundamentals Masterclass</a> and <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary">AI Bootcamp</a> give you a structured path forward.

The Simple Way to Make AI Useful at Work

<h3>TL;DR: Most teams want long-term AI impact but struggle to justify the investment without early wins. This article shows you how to use generative AI for fast, controlled gains while setting up the conditions for scalable ROI later. You’ll learn where the value sits today, how to avoid over-committing too early and what leaders need to focus on to turn experiments into repeatable results.</h3>&nbsp;A bit of a departure from my usual “how to start with AI” guides. Today I want to talk about value. Real value.&nbsp;Not the hype around models, but the actual economic and operational upside that generative AI can deliver, and how to approach it without putting your career and company at risk.If you’re unsure how to balance the pressure for quick hype BS results with the long-term promise of AI, this will help you find the middle ground, I hope.<h2>Where the AI value sits right now</h2>The economic potential of generative AI is enormous. The global number is in the trillions. But numbers that big don’t help you decide where to start.&nbsp;So here is the simpler <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au">AI Strategy Consulting's</a> more humble and practical version.<blockquote>Around 75 percent of the value sits in four functions:</blockquote><ol><li>Customer operations </li><li>Marketing and sales </li><li>Software engineering </li><li>Product and R&amp;D</li></ol>These areas get value faster because they rely on repetitive text-heavy tasks, complex decision support or constant documentation. Generative AI fits those patterns well.A few examples from a recent Mckinsey Report:<ol><li>Customer teams saw a 14 percent lift in issue resolution and 9 percent drop in handling time. </li><li>Developers using AI coding support finished tasks 56 percent faster. </li><li>Marketing teams lifted productivity by 5 to 15 percent with personalised content generation. </li><li>R&amp;D teams used AI to generate candidate molecules, speeding up design cycles significantly.</li></ol>For a non-technical leader, the implication is simple: You get ROI by placing AI inside work that repeats every day.<h2>Where long-term value will come from next</h2>Short-term wins clear the noise. Long-term value comes from integrating AI into actual processes.As generative AI expands, three shifts matter for leaders:1. Work automation accelerates Automation potential increases from around half of employee time to closer to 60–70 percent when generative tasks are included.2. Knowledge work is now exposed to automation Tasks involving judgement, analysis and applying expertise — historically the hardest to automate — now have far higher automation potential.3. Productivity gains depend on redeployment If teams use the time saved to do higher-value work, organisations see real productivity growth. If not, the gains evaporate.<h2>What this means for your first six months</h2>If you want ROI this year without creating chaos, the path is straightforward:<ul><li>Start with practical, repeatable tasks. </li><li>Document the workflow so the output is predictable. </li><li>Measure time saved, errors reduced and rework avoided. </li><li>Only expand to adjacent tasks once the first one is stable.</li></ul>This is where no-code and low-code tools help. They let you automate small steps safely, without committing to expensive builds before capability exists.Your long-term plan becomes easier when early wins prove the direction.<h2>Why you cannot scale without stability</h2>Every comapany or agency we work with faces the same trap: they see big numbers in research and try to scale too early.&nbsp;Generative AI has clear risks:<ul><li>intellectual property</li><li>fairness</li><li>reliability</li><li>explainability</li><li>security</li><li>environmental impact (yes, even if you have a reusable coffee cup in Brunswick..using AI has an environment impact).</li></ul>None of these are solved by enthusiasm. They’re managed through sequencing.You scale when:<ul><li>Your first few use cases are stable. </li><li>People understand how to work with AI. </li><li>Workflows are documented. </li><li>Review steps are clear. </li><li>The model choice matches the task.</li></ul>This is what protects ROIAI. Skipping this stage is what kills it.<h2>How I frame ROIAI with leaders</h2>When I talk to executives, I keep it practical:<ul><li>Immediate ROI comes from productivity improvements in daily tasks. </li><li>Long-term ROI comes from workflow redesign and capability building. </li><li>The economic upside appears only when both work together.</li></ul>This keeps leaders focused on impact instead of AI bubble hype.<h2>FAQ</h2>Q: How do we balance quick wins and long-term planning? A: Treat quick wins as proofs of value. Scale only when the team can maintain the improvements without external support.Q: What if we don’t know which use cases to pick? A: Choose tasks that repeat daily and drain time. These produce fast, measurable gains.Q: How do we know if a use case is too complex? A: If the workflow is unclear or the output is unpredictable, it’s too early. Start smaller.Q: When do we shift from prompting to automation? A: When the task is predictable, stable and repeated at volume.Q: How do we prevent AI from increasing risk? A: Start with controlled tasks, apply review steps and use no-code tools until capability matures.&nbsp;If your organisation wants help introducing AI safely, building early wins and creating a roadmap your teams can maintain, our N<a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation">o-Code and Low-Code AI Implementation</a>, <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI Fundamentals Masterclass</a> and <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp">AI Bootcamp</a> give you the structure to do this with a little more confidence.

Is there ROI in Generative AI?

Businessman using AI chatbot on smartphone with prompt input interface, artificial intelligence conversation, generative AI technology, virtual assistant and machine learning tools.

<h3>TL;DR: Most teams waste time on AI because they start with use cases that sound impressive rather than ones that actually work. This piece shows you a practical way to choose where generative AI fits, where traditional AI is a better choice, and when you need both. You’ll see how to make the decision in minutes instead of weeks and avoid pilots that stall because they never suited the problem in the first place.</h3>&nbsp; Teams usually ask me where they should “start with AI.” They expect a tool list. What they really need is a decision method.Too many early projects fail for the same reason: the wrong type of AI got matched to the wrong type of problem. It’s avoidable, and it has nothing to do with technical skill. It comes down to making the choice based on the output you need, not the hype around the tool.<blockquote>This is the part nobody tells beginners clearly enough.</blockquote><h2>Where generative AI belongs</h2>If the outcome you want is written, summarised, explained or restructured, you are in generative AI territory.It fits cleanly when the task involves:<ul><li>writing drafts or emails </li><li>summarising long documents </li><li>explaining complex content </li><li>responding to questions in plain language </li><li>extracting meaning from messy text </li><li>helping developers with documentation or tests</li></ul>Generative AI works because it handles unstructured information. If your work sits inside documents, notes, chat transcripts, reports or PDFs, this is usually the right fit.<h2>Where traditional AI is still the better choice</h2>Some teams assume generative AI replaces everything. It doesn’t.Traditional AI still outperforms generative models when the task is structured and predictable:<ul><li>classifying issues </li><li>detecting defects </li><li>forecasting demand or revenue </li><li>predicting risk </li><li>segmenting customers</li></ul>These tasks rely on historical data and patterns. Prediction, detection and scoring belong here. If you need a label, a probability or a forecast, use traditional AI and avoid unnecessary complexity.<h2>Where the best use cases sit: the overlap</h2>Most real work needs more than one model.Examples you’ll see in practice:<ol><li>A churn model predicts risk → generative AI explains the reasoning to the service team. </li><li>A defect model flags an issue → generative AI drafts the customer message. </li><li>A forecast model predicts demand → generative AI builds the summary for the planning meeting.</li></ol>The pattern is simple: <ul><li>Traditional AI gives you the signal. </li><li>Generative AI gives you the explanation.</li></ul>This combination removes hours of manual interpretation and a simple way to choose the right approach.Here’s the decision method I teach in my <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI masterclasses</a> because it works for beginners and it cuts through they current AI hype void pretty fast.Ask four questions:1. What outcome are we trying to achieve? Time saved, fewer errors, improved service, cost reduction.2. What format does the output need? Text, summaries, explanations → generative AI Predictions, scores, labels → traditional AI3. Do we have training data? Yes → traditional models perform better No → generative AI with clear prompting is faster and safer4. Do we need a win quickly? If yes, choose generative. It avoids long training cycles and gets value on the board early.That’s it. This is what stops teams from over-building their first project or picking a use case that never had a chance.<h2>What organisations learn once they apply this</h2>Once teams start matching the work to the right model, they notice the same things:<ul><li>Workflows get easier to improve because the decisions make sense. </li><li>Pilots don’t collapse halfway through. </li><li>People stop arguing about tools and start talking about outcomes. </li><li>Leaders see value without waiting six months for a model to train. </li><li>Teams build capability without fizzing out themselves.</li></ul>This is the difference between adoption and disruption.<h2>A real example: overloaded support teams</h2>Support teams see this problem every day: too many tickets, slow replies, no time to think. So we apply the framework:Traditional AI → identifies sentiment, classifies issue types, detects patterns. Generative AI → drafts responses, summarises history, creates tickets with context.The result is measurable: <ul><li>Faster handling. </li><li>Lower backlog. </li><li>More accurate summaries. </li><li>Better handover. </li><li>No extra headcount.</li></ul>This is the type of use case that works immediately because the workflow already exists.<h2>FAQ&nbsp;</h2>Q: How do I explain this decision to executives who want “generative AI everywhere”? A: Show the output. If the task needs written content, choose generative. If it needs prediction, choose traditional. Executives respond to clarity, not complexity.Q: What if my use case needs both? A: Use traditional AI for the structured part and generative AI for the interpretation or summary. They complement each other.Q: How do I avoid picking a use case that won’t deliver value? A: Test it against the four-question method. If it fails any step, deprioritise it.Q: Who should own this decision? A: Business leaders set the goal. Domain experts define requirements. Data teams confirm feasibility. All three sign off.Q: How soon should we see results? A: For generative AI, days. For traditional AI, weeks. If it takes longer, the use case was scoped wrong.If your organisation wants a clear, structured way to prioritise use cases and move from “guessing” to confident adoption, my <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI Fundamentals Masterclass</a> and<a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary"> AI Bootcamp </a>show you how to choose correctly, move quickly and avoid the traps that stall early AI projects.

How To Choose the Right AI Use Case

AI strategy consulting