Blog

Glowing dartboard with arrow, work process and business goal

<h3>TL;DR: Accoding to a MIT Study “AI doesn’t work.” It says most pilots don’t show P&amp;L impact on a six-month clock, while value concentrates in back-office automation, they assesed the front office. Shadow usage is rampant, with employees adopting LLMs far ahead of formal rollouts. This Blog shows you four things you can do to be in the successful 5%.</h3><h2>What the report actually says</h2><ul><li>Across 300+ public initiatives, 52 org interviews, and 153 leader surveys, ~95% of organisations saw no measurable return from GenAI pilots in the period measured. That is implemenation, not model failure.</li><li>Generic tools are explored by most firms, yet enterprise systems stall. About 60% evaluate enterprise-grade tools, 20% reach pilot, 5% reach production. The blockers are brittle workflows, weak learning and memory, and poor fit with day-to-day operations.&nbsp;</li><li>External partnerships outperform internal builds by roughly two to one, with success shares around 66% versus 33% in the interview sample.&nbsp;</li><li>Budgets skew to visible front-of-house experiments, while the cleanest ROI shows up in finance and operations through BPO substitution, reconciliation, documentation, and similar “boring” work.&nbsp;</li><li>Meanwhile, staff behaviour tells a different story: employee use of LLMs is far higher than official licensing, a gap the study quantifies with a 90% vs 40% chart.&nbsp;</li></ul><h2>The two traps killing ROI</h2>Trap 1: AI theatreExpensive productions designed to impress, not deliver.<ul><li>Demos that never graduate to production. </li><li>Success scored on technical metrics, not throughput, error rate, or cost. </li><li>Labs off to the side, no ties to real processes. </li><li>Big budgets, no P&amp;L movement. </li><li>This shows up when 60% evaluate, 20% pilot, 5% ship.&nbsp;</li></ul>Trap 2: Analysis paralysisPerfect frameworks, no delivery.Endless “readiness” and governance decks. Pristine data requirements before any build. Strategies that take years to finalise. Controls so tight nothing gets tried. All while the workforce is quietly using consumer LLMs every day. Close the gap by formalising what already works and integrating it into SOPs. AI News <h2>The four recurring failure patterns </h2><ol><li>Budgets chase shiny demos, not operational levers. Back-office wins get underfunded.&nbsp; </li><li>DIY dominates, even though external partnerships land about 2x the success.&nbsp; </li><li>Ownership gets tossed to IT. Winners put a business owner in the chair and use IT for guardrails.&nbsp; </li><li>Change management is an afterthought. Shadow usage proves appetite and sets expectations. Codify it.&nbsp;</li></ol><h2>Find value, then pick the tool</h2><ul><li>Pick a Lever: Tie every initiative to one of three levers: efficiency, customer experience, or revenue. If you can’t point to the metric you’ll move in 12 weeks, don’t start.</li><li>Design for use, not the stage:&nbsp;Start inside a high-frequency workflow. Augment people, don’t fight them. Ask a line manager, “What gets easier for your team on day one?” If the answer is vague, you’re still in theatre. </li><li>De-risk to build, 90-day sprint: Stand up a minimum viable solution with minimum viable governance. Integrate to the systems people already use. Measure throughput, error rate, and cycle time weekly. The study’s six-month ROI lens is tight, so compress feedback, not ambition.&nbsp; </li><li>Scale for impact, not noise: Only scale proven wins. Publish a Baseline Value Dashboard that shows three numbers the CFO cares about. Then clone the pattern into the next adjacent workflow. </li><li>Manage a portfolio, not a bet: Balance safe optimisations, strategic augments, and a small set of genuine experiments. Partnerships first, because data says they land more often. Build selectively where it becomes a core capability.&nbsp; </li></ul><h2>Where to start this quarter </h2><ol><li>Pick one counted workflow you close every week, for example claims triage, AP reconciliation, or customer email classification. </li><li>Buy a tool that already solves 80% of it, then tailor to your process. Hold the vendor to business metrics, not benchmark charts. AI News </li><li>Put a named business owner on the hook. IT supports privacy, security, and integration. </li><li>Productise the change: SOP, prompts, templates, training, and roll-back plan. Report the win, then do the neighbour workflow.</li></ol><h2>FAQ</h2>Q: Should we pause spend because “95% fail”? A: No. Reallocate to counted workflows with weekly metrics. Small wins fund the next step.Q: Where do we start if we are early? A: One high-frequency process, one owner, one vendor pilot. Measure cycle time, error rate, and throughput.Q: Build or buy? A: Buy first so you can ship and learn. Build only where the capability becomes core.Q: How do we keep it safe? A: Minimum viable governance. Access control, data handling rules, prompt and template publishing, exception review.Q: What if staff already use ChatGPT? A: Codify safe usage, publish approved patterns, and fold them into SOPs while sanctioned tools roll out.Q: How do we scale beyond the first win? A: Clone the pattern to the next adjacent workflow and keep a baseline Value Dashboard. Review the portfolio quarterly.If you only change three things<ul><li>Rebalance spend from showcases to one counted back-office workflow. </li><li>Start with a partner that fits your stack, then tailor. </li><li>Put a line leader on adoption with a weekly report.</li></ul> That is how you stop theatre and fund work that pays. Our <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp">AI 5 Day Bootcamp</a> covers a range of AI use cases you can learn to get fluent with AI delivery.

AI Fails 95% of the Time - 4 Areas that Won't

Concept Customer service and guarantee product. Man hand holding tablet show top service Quality assurance 5 star, Standards, ISO certification and standardization satisfaction, service experience.

<h3>TLDR: This blog shows you how to build a customer support escalation agent using n8n, Make, or Zapier connected to an LLM like OpenAI. The workflow classifies incoming support tickets, drafts suggested resolutions, pauses for human approval, and then generates the final customer response. It automates repetitive drafting while keeping humans in control of sensitive cases. The entire system runs on no-code/low-code tools, so you can set it up in days without heavy dev support.</h3><h2>Customer Service&nbsp; AI Agents</h2>Most tickets can be handled by chatbots, templates, or standard FAQs. But escalations such as refund requests, complaints, “call me back now” messages — are different. Automating them blindly risks tone-deaf or policy-breaking replies. Keeping them all manual slows your team to a crawl.An AI agent balances both: fast classification and drafting, with humans approving or editing before anything reaches a customer. That means fewer repetitive tasks, more consistent responses, and support teams freed to focus on cases that actually need judgment.<h2>&nbsp; The Cheat Sheet: How to Build the Escalation Agent</h2><ol><li>Classify tickets – Use n8n, Make, or Zapier to connect your helpdesk or email inbox. An AI model (OpenAI or similar) reviews each ticket and decides if it’s standard or an escalation. </li><li>Log escalations – Escalated cases are sent into Google Sheets or Airtable for tracking and visibility. Non-escalations continue through your normal automation. </li><li>Draft a resolution proposal – The LLM looks at the customer’s message, your policies (refund rules, discounts, SLAs), and any known issues. It creates a structured proposal such as: “Offer 20% refund, confirm new delivery date, apologise.” </li><li>Human approval loop – The draft is emailed to a manager through Gmail/Outlook. They approve, reject, or edit. The workflow pauses here until their response comes back. </li><li>Generate the final reply – Once approved, the LLM merges the customer’s original ticket, its draft, and any edits into a clear customer-facing message. If the draft is rejected, it revises and resubmits. </li><li>Data logging – Every ticket, AI draft, human edit, and final response is logged. Over time, this creates a dataset showing where AI performs well and where humans adjust. </li><li>Schedule automation – Add a trigger so the agent runs continuously on new incoming tickets. Start with one category (refunds, delivery issues) and expand as accuracy improves.</li></ol><h2>Why Build a Customer Support Escalation Agent?</h2>Escalations are the most stressful part of support. Refund requests, angry complaints, “manager please call me” tickets because they take time, slow down response times, and drain your team. Most businesses either throw more people at the problem or let issues drag on, both of which cost you money and reputation.This is where an AI agent makes sense. Instead of wasting hours drafting the same apology or refund email, the agent does the heavy lifting:<ul><li>It classifies tickets instantly so urgent cases don’t get buried in the queue. </li><li>It drafts structured responses using your policies and customer history. </li><li>It keeps humans in charge by pausing for manager approval before anything goes out. </li><li>It learns over time by logging edits, so your responses get faster and more accurate. </li></ul>The result should be: faster escalations, less effort from your team, and more consistent customer outcomes.&nbsp;<h2>FAQ</h2>Q: Do I need coding skills? No. n8n, Make, and Zapier use drag-and-drop. You just connect your helpdesk/email, Sheets, and AI.Q: How does human approval work in practice? Managers receive an email with the AI’s draft. They edit or approve directly from their inbox. The workflow waits for input before continuing.Q: Will this replace my CX team? No. It handles the repetitive drafting and escalations, but humans still decide final outcomes.Q: What happens if AI makes a poor suggestion? The manager edits it. The system logs the change so you can see patterns and improve prompts or policies over time.Q: What does this cost to run? The tools are affordable: n8n (open source or cloud), Make/Zapier subscriptions, and OpenAI API calls. Most small teams run this for less than the cost of a single part-time support hire, if that tbh.Q: How will my team adopt this? Because humans stay in control, adoption is smooth. Agents and managers see it as help, not replacement as the AI drafts, they decide.<h2>&nbsp; Build your AI Agent</h2>This is how you can build a customer support escalation agent in days with <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation">no-code and low-code</a> tools. It won’t replace your people. It gives them leverage automating the repetitive 80% while keeping them in charge of the critical 20%.For small businesses and lean teams, that’s the difference between firefighting and running support at scale. More speed, less busywork, and a system you own.

How to Build an AI Agent for Customer Support

Global Communication - North America (World Map Courtesy of NASA)

<h3>TL;DR: Most executives waste AI on gimmicky stuff. The right tools don’t just “save time” , they multiply your leverage. With them, you cut due diligence from days to hours, turn meetings into action, produce board-ready decks in minutes, and see business data as decisions, not spreadsheets. This cheat sheet covers the 20 tools that we think matter most: what they are, how to use them, and the commercial value they unlock if you’re responsible for people and P&amp;L.</h3><h2>AI for Execs</h2>If you’re leading a services business, government department, or corporate unit, you already feel the squeeze: more reporting, tighter margins, less time to think.AI can’t remove the weight of leadership. What it can do is strip away the waste: the half-day of research before a meeting, the five hours turning notes into slides, the constant ping-pong of diary logistics.These AI tools let you do your real job: deciding, communicating, and leading, without drowning in admin or base and repetitive tasks.<h2>The AI Game Changers</h2><h3>Research &amp; Insight</h3> 1. Comet (Perplexity) – AI Browser Cuts research cycles. Summarises competitor data, industry trends, and regulatory updates in real time. Executive value: Faster due diligence, cleaner briefings, better-prepared decisions.2. Claude (Anthropic) – Deep Reasoning Handles long, complex documents with logic and safety. Executive value: You don’t wait weeks for teams to digest contracts or policy papers — you see risks and options the same day.3. ChatGPT (OpenAI) – Versatile Utility Drafts, brainstorms, analyses, and connects with systems. Executive value: Speeches, memos, and strategy notes move from blank page to credible draft in minutes, freeing you for refinement and delivery.<h3>Productivity &amp; People</h3>4. Granola – Meeting Notes Transcribes and turns discussions into tasks, decisions, and risks. Executive value: Accountability is instant. No more “what did we agree?” moments that stall delivery.5. Wispr Flow / 6. Willow – Voice Dictation Accurate dictation with context awareness. Executive value: Commutes and corridors become productive time. Over a quarter, that’s days of regained capacity.7. Gamma – Decks, Docs, and Sites Transforms notes into professional slides or documents. Executive value: Board-ready content in hours, not days. Cuts consultant reliance and keeps decisions moving.8. Lindy – Workflow Agents Runs reminders, scheduling, and repetitive processes in the background. Executive value: Removes leadership drag. You stay in strategy, not diary wrangling.9. Julius AI – Data Analyst Turns spreadsheets into dashboards and insights. Executive value: Finance, ops, and HR data become patterns and calls to action, not noise. Decisions move faster.10. Superhuman – Inbox Management AI sorting and summarisation for email. Executive value: Critical messages surface, threads compress, and inbox fatigue drops. Responsiveness improves without extra hours.11. Happenstance – AI People Search Maps networks and relationships. Executive value: Faster hiring, sharper stakeholder analysis, and more targeted business development.<h3>Audience &amp; Influence</h3>12. Delphi – Clone Your Expertise Replicates your style and knowledge into scalable outputs. Executive value: Client engagement and internal training scale without diluting your voice.13. HeyGen – AI Avatars Generates avatars for scalable video content. Executive value: Speeds up staff comms, training, and client updates — no studio or endless retakes.14. Overlap – Multimodal Video Agents Builds richer video from varied inputs. Executive value: Creates investor updates, project briefs, or campaign videos quickly with context.15. Captions – Talking Video Editor Auto-subtitles, edits, and formats. Executive value: Professional talking-head video in minutes, useful for leadership comms or thought leadership.<h3>Product &amp; Market</h3>16. Cursor – AI Code Editor Accelerates software builds. Executive value: Prototypes and internal tools ship quickly without needing a big dev team.17. Replit – Apps From Plain Language Describe an app; get working code. Executive value: You can test ideas with clients or staff in days, not quarters.18. Anychat.one – Unified AI Access Connects multiple models in one interface. Executive value: Flexibility to pick the right AI for the job without chasing 10 subscriptions.19. Windsurf – AI Autocomplete for Code Improves developer speed. Executive value: Your tech team spends less time typing boilerplate and more time on differentiation.<h3>Creativity &amp; Engagement</h3>20. ElevenLabs – AI Voice Generation Creates natural voices for narration, training, or comms. Executive value: Turns staff onboarding, compliance training, or client updates into professional audio assets without production cost.<h2>Use this AI stack</h2><ol><li>Pick one per category. Don’t overwhelm yourself or your team. </li><li>Run 4-week pilots. Tie each to a metric: hours saved, error rate cut, or turnaround time improved. </li><li>Log everything. Prompts, errors, outputs. That log is your compliance shield and learning base. </li><li>Scale only what works. If a pilot saves time or sharpens delivery, standardise it. If not, stop and switch. </li></ol><h2>FAQs</h2>Q1: How do I stop staff using AI off the books? Give them approved tools and guardrails. Shadow adoption fades when leadership provides sanctioned options. Actually...this is a hard one, your staff are already using it, it is too late.Q2: What’s the right first tool to deploy? Granola (meetings into actions) or Julius (data into dashboards). Both show visible ROI in week one.Q3: Do I need new roles to manage these tools? Not at the start. Assign ownership to existing managers. Expand later only if usage scales.Q4: How do I measure ROI without extra systems? Track three numbers: hours saved, turnaround time, and reduced error rate. These map directly to cost and margin.Q5: What’s the governance risk if I move too fast? Unlogged outputs. Without audit trails, you can’t defend decisions. Require every AI tool to record prompts, sources, and reviewers.Q6: How do I avoid overwhelming my team? Phase adoption. One tool per workflow. Don’t “launch AI”; fix one pain point, prove value, and build momentum. AI tools add value because they compound your capacity as a leader: compressing research, turning meetings into actions, cutting the lag in comms, and surfacing decisions from raw data. FAST.Pick the right stack and you scale yourself.That’s exactly why we built the <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI Fundamentals Masterclass</a>: to show executives where to start, which tools pay off, and how to govern them safely. If you carry responsibility for people, clients, or P&amp;L...consider jumping on it.

AI Cheat Sheet: AI Tools to 20x Your Value

A graphic representation of teamwork and attraction, featuring a gear and a magnet against a blue background. 3d rendering

<h3>TLDR: This lead scraping agent automates prospecting. It scrapes business directories like White Pages, uses AI to clean and structure the data, and pushes it into Google Sheets, your CRM, or Lemlist. Once the list is live, Lemlist sends targeted emails and Trillet adds voice AI calls. The result: a consistent, affordable pipeline you control, without paying for bad lists or hiring more staff.</h3><h2>Why Leads Matter</h2>Most small businesses don’t have spare headcount to spend on data entry. Reps and owners end up wasting hours copying names and numbers into spreadsheets. Buying lists is no better — they’re often out of date, full of duplicates, or missing half the details you actually need.This workflow removes the horrible busywork. You set the search terms, the city, and the data you want. The agent does the scraping, parsing, and cleaning for you. By the time it lands in your sheet or CRM, the list is usable. That’s time back and a pipeline you can actually rely on.<h2>The Cheat Sheet: How to Build the Lead Scraping Agent</h2>Here’s the end-to-end build, stripped into steps you can follow in n8n, Make, or Zapier:<ol><li>Set the scope – Pick niche + city, copy the directory URL, count pages. </li><li>Build in n8n – Import workflow template, no need to start from scratch. </li><li>Scraping setup – Connect OxyLabs to bypass captchas/dynamic sites. </li><li>AI extraction – Use OpenAI to pull name, phone, website, years, address. </li><li>Loop through pages – Workflow cycles every page, not just the first. </li><li>Clean data – Deduplicate on phone/website, drop junk rows. </li><li>Store leads – Send to Google Sheets, Airtable, or your CRM. </li><li>Outreach – Push to Lemlist for email; use Trillet for voice follow-ups. </li><li>Customise – Change fields, queries, and schedule runs with Cron. </li><li>Test and run – Start with 3 pages, confirm accuracy, then scale to full list.</li></ol>You can test with three pages first, then scale to a full scrape once you’re happy with the quality. Add a trigger so it runs daily or weekly without you touching it.<h2>How We Use It</h2>I run this exact agent for my AI consulting business. Instead of chasing lists or paying for stale data, I scrape my target sectors, clean the results, and send them straight into Lemlist. Trillet then follows up with voice AI calls to the same prospects. The combination keeps my pipeline warm and active, while my time goes into real conversations — not admin.<h2>FAQ</h2>Q: Do I need coding skills? No. n8n, Make, and Zapier are drag-and-drop. You just connect a few keys and set your queries.Q: How do I avoid junk leads? The agent validates numbers and removes incomplete rows before they reach your sheet or CRM.Q: Can I run it regularly? Yes. Schedule it weekly or daily so new leads keep flowing automatically.Q: Is it compliant? Scraping public directories is usually fine, but you must respect local privacy and spam rules. The system keeps audit logs so you know when and where data came from.Q: Why use Trillet after Lemlist? Because most people ignore cold emails. Trillet’s short, AI-driven voice calls cut through and get meetings booked.<h2>AI is a Sales Multiplier - Use it</h2>This isn’t a gimmick,&nbsp; it’s an AI agent that does the job of a prospecting team. It scrapes the leads, cleans them, emails them, and then calls them. That means a pipeline that builds itself and follows up, without extra staff or overpriced brokers.For small businesses, that’s a game change: affordable, reliable lead generation that doesn’t drain your time. For agencies and sales teams, it’s a way to stay in front of prospects while you focus on closing.I build these systems using <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation">no-code and low-code tools</a>. In a week, you’ll have a working agent tuned to your market, with Lemlist handling email campaigns and Trillet picking up the phone. The result is simple: more leads, lower cost, and a system you actually own.

Generate Leads with AI: How to Build a Lead Scraping Agent

<h3>TLDR: AI strategy today isn’t about building smarter models, it’s about applying them safely and visibly in daily work. For non-technical leaders, the quick start is simple: set standards for error and data, equip staff with approved tools, run controlled experiments, and scale what proves useful. Do this and AI reduces wasted time, improves service quality, and strengthens compliance.</h3>Mustafa Suleyman, one of the original builders of modern AI systems, puts it plainly: the question is no longer “what can AI do?” but “how do we apply and control it?”That shift lands directly on non-technical executives. AI mistakes don’t show up as broken code, they show up as:<ul><li>Reports that look polished but contain gaps you can’t defend. </li><li>Client-facing outputs that drift into non-compliance. </li><li>Staff quietly rejecting AI because it feels imposed or undermines their judgement. </li></ul>The cultural risk is as real as the compliance one. Teams will not adopt AI if they see it as a black box or a shortcut that shifts accountability onto them. Adoption works only when leaders make AI transparent, auditable, and visibly tied to improving their work.&nbsp;What AI leaders must set from day oneAI isn’t a technical problem, it’s a leadership one. Before rolling out tools, leaders need to set non-negotiable standards:<ul><li>Error thresholds: Define what level of mistakes is tolerable by context. A 5% slip in meeting notes might be acceptable; a 1% slip in regulatory reporting is not. </li><li>Data boundaries: Make it clear what data AI can touch and what is off-limits — financial records, personal identifiers, or confidential contracts. </li><li>Audit logs: Require every AI-assisted output to show its inputs, version, and human reviewer. Without logs, you have no defence. </li><li>Ownership: Assign accountability for AI oversight to a named leader. Shared responsibility means no responsibility. </li><li>Staff communication: Explain clearly what AI is meant to improve, and what it will never decide without human review. </li></ul>These are management decisions, not IT settings. Getting them wrong turns AI into a liability. Getting them right makes it a performance tool.<h2>The quick start to AI Strategy</h2>Once the ground rules are set, organisations can begin small but structured adoption.<ol><li>Equip staff with safe tools: Provide access to general-purpose models like ChatGPT or Claude, and layer in practical add-ons such as speech-to-text for productivity and meeting transcription for records. Start with tasks where value is visible immediately — drafting, summarising, note-taking. </li><li>Encourage controlled experimentation: Authorise AI use and bring it above board. Hold short weekly sessions where staff share what worked and what didn’t. Capture those learnings into a central FAQ or playbook so knowledge builds over time.</li><li>Formalise small cross-functional teams: Back the 1–5% of curious, adaptable staff. Give them 12-week challenges tied to outcomes like faster client response times or reduced admin load. Share their results internally to build confidence and momentum. </li></ol>These steps don’t require technical hires. They require leadership commitment, clear rules, and a willingness to act.<h2>FAQ</h2>Q: Do we need data scientists before starting? A: No. Begin with existing staff. Governance and logs come first. Specialists can follow once scale demands it.Q: How do we keep compliance teams onside? A: Make explainability mandatory. Every output should have a recorded prompt, source, and reviewer. Without that, don’t deploy.Q: What’s the safest first use case? A: Pick repetitive, text-heavy tasks where mistakes carry little risk but improvements are measurable — meeting notes, report drafts, enquiry summaries.Q: How quickly should we see results? A: Within 4–6 weeks. If nothing measurable improves by then, the scope is wrong.Q: What happens if we delay adoption? A: Staff will use AI anyway, but without controls. That creates compliance exposure and fragmented results. Leaders need to own the process, not chase it.&nbsp; If you’re accountable for delivery, compliance, or client trust, AI can’t sit in the IT corner. It’s already in your workflows, whether sanctioned or not. The first step is to know where you stand. That’s why I built the AI Readiness Assessment — a structured, data-driven way to surface gaps and opportunities so you can apply AI safely and visibly.

AI Strategy Quick Start Guide

AI Agents Analyse for Business concept, AI assistants perform goals, Businessman use AI technology, Assistants working to make decisions for industry, New Ideas, Marketing, financial, Automate system

<h3>TLDR: AI agents can take work off your team’s plate, but most fail because they look right on the surface while hiding errors underneath. To make them effective, you need to define a narrow scope, set clear rules, validate outputs, and track everything. If you do, you’ll save hours of repetitive work, reduce mistakes, and finally get proof that AI is worth scaling.</h3><h2>Why an Agent is worth your time</h2>If you’re reading about AI agents in the press, you’ll see grand claims about systems “working autonomously.” The reality is that most deployments create more mess than they fix. Your staff end up double-checking outputs, clients lose trust in deliverables, and the efficiency never materialises.This matters because the organisations that do get it right will reduce admin overhead by 20–30%. That’s not us drinking cool aid, that’s because tasks like classification, summarisation, and templated reporting are perfect for agents if you set them up correctly.<h2>What an AI agent is</h2>Think of your mother in law. Actually...do not! An AI agent isn’t a chatbot. It doesn’t just answer queries you input, it takes goals and tries to achieve them. It breaks the goal into smaller steps, pulls in tools or data, and adapts when things change.For example, instead of replying to a client’s query, an agent might:<ul><li>File the query in the right system. </li><li>Check relevant records. </li><li>Draft a reply for approval. </li></ul>That difference between chatting and acting is why design matters. If you treat an agent like a chatbot, it’ll produce confident nonsense.Agent Lie (“alignment faking”)Research shows agents often optimise for looking correct. They’ll present a polished answer even when it’s wrong.Think about a client report: an agent could leave gaps but still deliver a neat PDF. Unless you add checks, those gaps only surface when a client points them out. By then, the damage to trust and credibility is already done.This isn’t a technical glitch, rather it is an 'on you' failure. You can prevent it by deciding upfront what the agent can and cannot do, and how its outputs are verified.<h2>How to design agents</h2>The process isn’t complicated, but skipping steps is what gets teams into trouble.Start small. Pick a single, repeatable task. For instance, classifying client emails or compiling data into a standard report. The key is clarity—if you can’t explain the task in plain language, the agent won’t handle it well either.Define boundaries. Don’t tell the agent to “manage finance.” Tell it to “generate invoice summaries from approved templates and flag anomalies for review.” The difference is the line between safe automation and chaos.Validate outputs. Human spot checks or automated rules need to be built in. A 10% sample check often catches errors before they scale. If the error rate is high, tighten the rules before expanding.Keep logs. Every action the agent takes should be recorded. That way, if something goes wrong, you can trace it back instead of guessing whether it was a bad instruction, poor data, or faulty reasoning.Expand only when proven. Once the agent consistently saves time and passes checks, then widen its remit. Until then, resist the temptation to throw bigger tasks at it.Value? It’s measurable:<ol><li>Time back: A marketing team that triaged leads manually for three hours now spends 20 minutes reviewing flagged cases. </li><li>Error reduction: A compliance team spots anomalies earlier because the agent highlights missing fields instead of ignoring them. </li><li>Evidence for scaling: With hours saved and errors reduced, leaders have proof to justify expanding use safely. </li></ol>Done properly, agents don’t just cut costs. They build confidence that your staff aren’t wasting energy on repetitive admin while also protecting against avoidable mistakes.<h2>FAQ</h2>Q: How do I know if a task is right for an agent? Pick something repetitive, rule-based, and already documented. If your staff can describe the task in steps, it’s a good candidate.Q: What happens if I let an agent loose without boundaries? It’ll fill gaps with plausible answers. That might look fine internally but becomes damaging when clients or auditors catch the errors.Q: How do I prove ROI to leadership? Track before-and-after metrics: time spent on the task, number of errors, and amount of rework. Without numbers, leadership won’t buy into scaling.Q: Do I need to hire engineers to build these? Not at the start. No-code platforms make it possible to pilot agents without technical hires. But once you scale into client-sensitive or compliance-heavy tasks, expert oversight is non-negotiable.Q: How is this different from a chatbot? A chatbot reacts. An agent plans, acts, and adapts. That shift is why oversight is critical.If you want clarity on where to start, our<a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary"> AI 5 Day Bootcamp</a> identifies safe entry points for agents, and shows you how to scale without risk.

AI Blog

AI Fails 95% of the Time - 4 Areas that Won't

How to Build an AI Agent for Customer Support

AI Cheat Sheet: AI Tools to 20x Your Value

Generate Leads with AI: How to Build a Lead Scraping Agent

AI Strategy Quick Start Guide

How to Build AI Agents that Work