Blog

Happy New Year 2025. New AI technology trends in 2025 concept. Artificial Intelligence robot hand holding 2025 New Year technology, Ideas about AI playing a huge role in lives and economics.

<h3>TLDR: Most teams aren't AI-ready. Not because they lack tools—but because their workflows, roles, and guardrails were built for a human-only workforce. To prepare properly, you need to test AI in live work, redesign your processes, and make governance practical—not theoretical. This article shows how to start, what to watch out for, and where our <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-readiness-assessment" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-readiness-assessment">Readiness Assessment</a> can save you time.</h3><h2>What does “AI readiness” actually mean in 2025? </h2>If you think it means:Everyone knows what GPT stands for You bought a licence to Microsoft Copilot There’s a one-pager in HR about responsible AI use You're not ready.AI readiness means:Your team knows which tasks AI supports—and which ones it shouldn’t touch Your processes have been redesigned to make room for AI, not broken by it Your policies cover real-world usage, not vague principles If you don’t know where your gaps are, you can’t fix them. That’s why we built the <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-readiness-assessment" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-readiness-assessment">AI Readiness Assessment </a>in the first place.<h2>How do you assess your team’s AI capability?</h2>Most training fails because it’s generic, theoretical, or outsourced. To build actual capability, start inside your own workflows.Here’s how.1. How do you redefine job roles for hybrid teams? Sit with each function lead and break down their typical tasks Categorise each task: predictable, judgment-based, data-heavy, client-facing Mark what AI can help with vs. what it shouldn’t. Update the role definition with AI-supported tasks, manual review points, and new accountability flows This doesn’t just manage risk. It builds psychological safety (a big deal given the WHS rules in Australia).&nbsp; 2. How do you redesign a workflow with AI? Pick a live process. One your team runs weekly or monthly. An example: customer onboarding, writing funding reports, handling internal requests.<ul><li>Map every step </li><li>Label each one: AI-draftable / searchable / requires human discretion / must be reviewed </li><li>Rebuild the process using actual tools (e.g. Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Notion) </li><li>Run the new version manually. Don’t automate yet. Let your team learn through friction</li></ul>We do this with clients in every AI Bootcamp—because until someone rewrites their work, none of it sticks.3. What’s the best way to upskill non-technical teams? Start with the work they already know. Run 1-hour drop-in sessions: bring a task, prompt a model, share results. Do working tests live on real documents or emails,&nbsp; share prompts, outcomes, and revision logic. This builds fluency, not just awareness. We cover it in our <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI Fundamentals Masterclass</a> using your own business context.4. How do you promote responsible experimentation? Most of the risk isn’t in bad actors. It’s in confused employees using AI in ways no one sees.&nbsp;Fix it by creating structured transparency:<ul><li>A shared doc or channel: “How AI helped this week” </li><li>Post: task, prompt, result, what saved time, what needed review </li><li>Normalise small wins. Treat failed attempts as case studies, not problems </li><li>If you wait for permission to try, your team will do it anyway.</li></ul>They probably already are. You just won’t know how.<h2>What if your policies aren’t built for AI?</h2>Most aren’t.Check your current docs:<ul><li>Does your acceptable use policy mention LLMs? </li><li>Are you logging what tools are used, and where outputs go? </li><li>Who owns AI-generated content in your org? </li><li>Do reviewers know how to spot hallucinations or bias?</li></ul>If the answer is no, fix it before an incident forces the question. We handle this directly inside your <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-enterprise-strategy-roadmap" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-enterprise-strategy-roadmap">AI Strategy Roadmap</a>, so you don’t end up retrofitting compliance later.&nbsp;What results should you expect from doing this properly?<ul><li>Fewer hidden uses of AI. More shared methods </li><li>Faster, more consistent outputs—without replacing your people </li><li>A visible culture of “safe to try” experimentation </li><li>And better decision-making because governance is baked in </li></ul><h2>FAQs</h2>Q: How do we know if we’re ready for AI? A: Take the AI Readiness Assessment. It measures seven areas—strategy, tech, data, people, risk, ethics, and efficiency—and gives you a score with actions to improve.Q: We already did AI training. Isn’t that enough? A: Probably not. If staff haven’t applied AI to their own work, most of what they learned is sitting in a slide deck. Capability requires repetition and context.Q: Is this just for digital or technical teams? A: No. Some of the biggest gains come from legal, finance, operations, and frontline service teams—where GenAI reduces admin and speeds up decision support.Q: What’s the first low-risk step we can take? A: Run a live working session. Use a real task, try an AI tool together, and reflect on what saved time or improved clarity. Don’t over-engineer it. Just start.&nbsp; Where to Start <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-readiness-assessment" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-readiness-assessment">AI Readiness Assessment</a>: Benchmark your capability, risk, and opportunity areas <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI Fundamentals Masterclass</a>: Learn how GenAI works by applying it to your own work <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp">AI Bootcamp:</a> Redesign one live workflow using real tools <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-enterprise-strategy-roadmap" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-enterprise-strategy-roadmap">AI Strategy Roadmap</a>: Align your team, governance, and investment across functionsThis work is easier than you think. But only if you stop waiting and start testing. We’ll show you where to begin.&nbsp;

How to Prepare Your Business for AI. A Cheat Sheet

Woman writing in notebook near laptop, holographic AI circuit el

<h3>TLDR: A curated list of 50 free AI eBooks might feel like the right starting point. But if your team still hasn’t automated a single task or improved a real workflow, the issue isn’t knowledge: it’s application. This post shows how no code AI tools bridge that gap and help non-technical teams go from learning to doing.</h3>&nbsp; AI Reading Isn’t AI Capability You’ve saved the bookmarks. You’ve downloaded the PDFs. You’ve read the intros to neural networks, reinforcement learning, and AI ethics.Still, nothing in your business runs differently.<blockquote>That’s the problem.</blockquote>This eBook roundup gives learners access to everything from AI basics to advanced systems. It’s valuable, but it assumes one thing most professionals don’t have: a technical environment to experiment in.If you’re in operations, marketing, admin, compliance, or service delivery—you don’t need to understand the maths behind a neural net. You need to know how to use a no-code AI tool to stop copy-pasting the same document 15 times a week.<h2>Why Most AI Learning Stalls Before Action</h2>Professionals often confuse intellectual understanding with practical fluency.You can know what supervised learning is without knowing how to automate lead capture with a GPT plugin. You can read about model pipelines without knowing how to structure a prompt that returns usable data.&nbsp; Knowledge is passive. Workflows are active. That’s where no-code tools come in.<h2>What No-Code AI Tools Actually Do?</h2>They turn AI from theory into action. They let non-technical teams build tools that would have once needed an engineer.Think:<ul><li>Automating intake forms using AI classifiers </li><li>Summarising documents with GPT in Notion or Airtable </li><li>Using Make or Zapier to connect chat, docs, and decision-making flows </li><li>Generating email drafts based on live form inputs </li><li>No command line. No model training.</li></ul><h2>One Example: From eBook Collector to Workflow Builder</h2>A client team had gone deep on AI education. They had slides. They had eBooks. They had a 4-hour internal AI explainer.&nbsp;They still hadn’t changed a single operational process.We asked: where are you still buried in admin? Answer: formatting weekly performance reports.We used a no-code tool to connect Google Sheets, extract key metrics, and generate AI-powered summaries for managers. The whole system took 90 minutes to prototype.They now save 6–8 hours per week.They didn’t need more theory. They needed to test something real.<h2>You Don’t Need to Learn Everything. You Need to Build One Thing.</h2>Start with one task you already hate doing. The one that’s slow, repetitive, and easy to get wrong.Don’t ask if AI can help, rather test it. Pick a no-code tool. Build a first version. See what breaks. Fix it.We do this with clients every week. In our <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-no-code-low-code-implementation">Low/No-Code AI Implementation</a> service, we prototype real systems using the tools your team already knows.&nbsp;<h2>FAQ</h2>Q: Should I stop learning about AI and jump into tools? No, but stop delaying action. If you’re still only reading, you’re not building capability.Q: What’s the best no-code AI tool to start with? The one closest to your existing workflow. Airtable, Notion, Make, Zapier, even Google Docs with GPT: whatever’s already in use.Q: I’m not technical, can I still build something useful? Yes. Most no-code tools are visual and logic-based. You don’t need to code. You need to be clear on what you want the AI to do.Q: How do I know if a workflow is right for automation? It’s predictable, rules-based, and repeatable. If you do it every week and it follows the same steps, it’s probably a good candidate.Q: What if I get it wrong? Then you’ll learn something useful. That’s why we start with low-risk tasks. Speed of learning beats perfection.

You’ve Downloaded the AI eBooks. Now What?

TLDR: Your CEO just dropped “I used ChatGPT” in a meeting. Suddenly, AI is on the agenda. But executive interest doesn’t mean your team is ready to act. This post explains what leaders are really doing with AI, why copying them won’t work, and what you should do to build practical capability without needing to code or wait for AI permission.<h2>God Help Us, the CEO’s Using ChatGPT</h2>It starts with a headline: “NVIDIA execs use ChatGPT for strategy.” “Salesforce leaders summarise meetings with AI.” “OpenAI’s COO brainstorms with GPT.”Then your boss tries it. And now AI is “a priority.”We’ve seen this before. <blockquote>A single comment from the C-suite, and suddenly AI lands in your inbox, your stand-ups, your team objectives minus any clear plan, structure, or resources.</blockquote>The problem isn’t the real problem. The problem is what happens next.What They’re Actually Doing (and Not Doing)According to Entrepreneur, senior leaders at NVIDIA, OpenAI, and Salesforce are using ChatGPT for very specific tasks:<ul><li>Summarising dense material </li><li>Exploring early-stage ideas </li><li>Drafting quick notes or emails </li><li>They’re not automating entire workflows. </li><li>They’re not handing decision-making to AI. </li></ul>They’re using it the way most people use a calculator: to speed up something they already understand. Valuable work does not need to be suffering work...Now...it’s useful. It’s efficient. But.... it’s not a blueprint for your team.Because what works for an executive reviewing board papers doesn’t translate to the service team buried in 90 minute manual processes using excel macros from Dawn who built it in 2006 before retiring.<h2>What Happens If You Just Copy</h2>Here’s where teams go wrong. They see a leader using ChatGPT for light summarising, so they try to roll it out across operations or client services: no context, no structure, no fit.People test it once, it breaks, and they move on.Or worse, they keep pretending to use it to look innovative (this is my favourite), while continuing the same manual work behind the scenes. The team burns out trying to “do AI” without any of the conditions that made it useful to the exec in the first place.Do this InsteadStart by asking: where are we still wasting time on repetitive, low-stakes work Forget strategy decks. Forget 3 year roadmaps. Find the report you build every week. The intake form you reformat. The email you rewrite five times.That’s where ChatGPT works.Test it in that context. Use public data. Keep it contained. Document what worked, and what didn’t. Then talk about it. That’s how real capability starts.<h2>CEOs Using ChatGPT Isn’t the Red Hot Signal</h2>You don’t need to match the CEO’s use case. You need to respond to the opportunity. Executive interest is air cover. It gives you permission to try things without having to convince people that AI is relevant.&nbsp;But relevance isn’t the point. Execution is. What matters is whether your team can produce a single workflow that works better than it did before.&nbsp;<h2>FAQ</h2>Q: Why does it matter that CEOs are using ChatGPT? Because it creates top-down endorsement. It signals that AI experimentation is acceptable. That removes a major blocker for most teams.Q: Should we start using AI the same way our execs are? Not directly. Execs use AI for thinking, prep, and summarising. Teams should use it where there's repeatable process and measurable output.Q: We don’t have technical staff—can we still do something? Yes. Tools like ChatGPT, Claude, or no-code automation platforms require no coding. What matters more is choosing the right task.Q: What’s a safe first step? Start with internal content: SOPs, old reports, FAQs. Use AI to summarise or reformat. Avoid live customer interactions until it’s tested.Q: What if leadership is watching but not helping? Deliver one working example. A single 30% time-saving task is more convincing than another AI whiteboard session.When your CEO says they’ve started using ChatGPT..... panic. This is bad news for you...hours spent on wasted whimms...rather... Don’t do a innovative theatre performance. Build one thing that works. Then move on to the next.

What to Do When Your CEO Starts Using ChatGPT

Businessman use artificial intelligence AI technology for enhanced work efficiency data analysis and efficient tools, Unlocking Work potential with AI solutions chatbot help solve work problems.

TLDR: You’ve bookmarked the tools, read the guides, saved the prompt libraries. But your team still hasn’t delivered a single working AI use case. This post breaks down why content consumption stalls progress, and how to shift from passive learning to applied capability using structured frameworks like IDEA and CARE.<h2>AI Content ≠ Capability</h2>Content consumption rewards scanning, not thinking. It fragments understanding across 50 tools, 10 frameworks, and a dozen contradictory diagrams.It also creates false confidence. Teams mistake exposure for readiness. They believe reading about an AI tool means they can spot where it fits. It doesn’t.They need a system for translating knowledge into action. One that constrains thinking enough to make decisions, not just generate ideas.&nbsp;Inside both my client engagements and Masterclass, we use IDEA and CARE frameworks. But not as theory. They’re applied to live problems, in real-time, with actual team workflows.IDEA helps scope and select:<ul><li>What’s the actual result we want? </li><li>Where does the data live, and is it usable? </li><li>What’s the current effort required? </li><li>Is this automatable, or are we forcing it? </li></ul>CARE comes after, to communicate it:<ul><li>What’s broken in plain terms? </li><li>What action will we trial? </li><li>What outcome tells us if it worked? </li><li>What does the prototype or workflow look like? </li></ul>In one session, I had a student group map out a staff onboarding process they thought could be improved with AI. At first, they went straight to tools: “Could we use Claude to answer FAQs?” “What if we build a chatbot for HR?”We pulled them back. Used IDEA to reframe. What was the actual problem? Delays in IT provisioning and missed manual steps in role-based onboarding.The data existed. The effort was high. And yes, the task was rules-based and repeatable. But it wasn’t an LLM problem. It was a workflow orchestration issue.So we prototyped something simpler: a no-code agent that pulls role data, triggers app provisioning, and logs task status for HR. No chatbot. No prompt library. Just the right solution for the real friction.That shift from tool-first to outcome led is what most professionals never make. Because they’ve never been taught how. One AI Use Case, One ChangeA client in marketing ops spent months sharing AI articles internally. They had a shared folder of 40+ tools, 12 prompt guides, and two pages of AI notes in Notion. Still, no change in how the team worked.We sat with them. Took one repeated task: campaign reporting. Scoped it using IDEA. Applied CARE to make the test legible to the team. In less than two weeks, they weren’t talking about AI. They were using it to summarise cross-platform reports with a 70 percent time saving.This is a pattern I’ve seen again and again, whether with leadership teams or university students in applied innovation programs. Progress comes from a method to trial something grounded.<h2>FAQ</h2>Q: I’ve collected great resources: why hasn’t anything changed? A: Because collecting isn’t the same as applying. You need a structured way to trial ideas and link them to real outcomes.Q: Can I use IDEA and CARE without technical skills? A: Yes. These frameworks are designed to help you think clearly about the problem and opportunity, not build the solution yourself. We use them in our Masterclass to help non-technical professionals go from first principles to functional use cases.Q: What’s the first move? A: Pick a repetitive task with clear inputs and outputs. Use IDEA to see if automation fits. If it does, write up a CARE summary and test it in no-code.&nbsp;So....start building capability. You don’t need another roundup. You need to learn how to think structurally. How to test small. How to assess fit before you pick a tool.&nbsp;That’s what we teach inside the <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI Fundamentals Masterclass.</a> Because whether we are working with public sector teams or postgrads, the issue is never access to AI. It’s the lack of method to use it ......and to use it....well.

Why Most of Us Stay Stuck at “AI Curious”

Watch, security and woman with radio, cctv and monitor for danger, talking and control room for guard. Desk, night and working for protection, safety and communication to backup and connection

<h3>TLDR: Google’s AgentSpace marks a shift from demos to deployable agents. These aren’t chatbots, they’re autonomous units that run workflows, escalate tasks, and interact with tools across the tech stack. This blog explains how enterprise teams can prepare for agent based collaboration, without waiting for IT to catch up.</h3><h2>What Is Google AgentSpace?</h2>AgentSpace isn’t just another AI feature release. It formalises what many teams have been hacking together with custom GPTs, Make.com, and internal tools.What Google now offers natively:<ul><li>Agent infrastructure with memory, logic, and multi-step task handling </li><li>Integrations across Workspace, Vertex AI, and third-party APIs </li><li>Agent lifecycle tools (permissions, identity, context retention) </li><li>A UI for building and managing them inside enterprise environments </li></ul>In short, agents are now products, not just prompts.<h2>From Tool Users to Agent Designers</h2>Most teams aren’t set up to handle this currently. They think in terms of tools and dashboards because that is how it has always been, but not in terms of autonomous agents that behave like junior staff.That requires a new layer of thinking:<ul><li>What role does the agent play in your workflow? </li><li>What decisions should it make alone vs escalate? </li><li>How does it coordinate with people, not just tools?</li></ul><h2>Real Example: Workflow Agents in Action</h2> A national logistics firm tested agent-based tracking and alerts across their operations.Before:<ul><li>Manual data entry across 4 systems </li><li>Alerts via Slack when someone remembered </li><li>Escalations missed on weekends </li></ul>With agents:<ul><li>AI monitors order flow and stock levels in real time </li><li>Flags anomalies and escalates before they breach SLA </li><li>Operates 24/7 with audit logs and explainable actions</li></ul>This saved 30+ hours per week and reduced missed handovers by 80%.<h2>Getting Ready for AI Agents</h2>The tech now exists. But your processes, roles, and governance really don’t.So this is how you should prepare:<ol><li>Map your workflows: Where can an agent act without human delay? </li><li>Redesign roles: Create space for agents to perform, not just assist </li><li>Define escalation rules: Make clear when human review is needed </li><li>Prototype in no-code: Use tools like Make, Airtable, or AgentSpace itself to test live flows</li></ol>What This Means for Team Collaboration In a post-AgentSpace world:<ul><li>Meetings drop, handoffs shrink, and tool fatigue lessens </li><li>Success depends on how well the agents are briefed </li><li>Collaboration becomes a system design challenge</li></ul>That’s why our <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp">AI Bootcamp </a>focuses on agent orchestration and workflow redesign, not just prompts and tools. We help you prototype, pilot, and govern agents in a way your team can actually use.<h2>&nbsp;FAQ</h2>Q: How is AgentSpace different from using ChatGPT or Gemini? A: ChatGPT is a conversation tool. AgentSpace builds long-running, autonomous agents with memory, logic, and tool access. It’s a platform, not a chatbot.Q: Do I need developers to use this? A: No. You can build agents with no-code tools or via UI-based templates. Technical teams help scale, but non-technical teams can start now.Q: What’s the risk of deploying agents too early? A: Poorly scoped agents can flood teams with noise or make silent mistakes. Start small, use audit logs, and apply clear rules on what’s agent-led vs human-controlled.&nbsp;Don’t wait for an AI Centre of Excellence to approve a year-long pilot. Start by redesigning just one workflow and watch the handoffs disappear.&nbsp;Join the <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp">AI Bootcamp </a>or book a Readiness Assessment to build your first agent-ready process.

What Google's "AgentSpace" Means for Workflows

Friendly pharmacist showing information on digital tablet to customer in drugstore

TLDR: Agentic AI doesn’t just process data, it chooses what to research, how to analyse it, and when to stop. That shift rewires the role of researchers from knowledge workers to system architects. This post explains what agentic AI means for research teams, and how to prepare using no-code tools and workflow redesign.<h2>Why Research Teams Can’t Ignore Agentic AI</h2>Traditional research relied on human-driven questions, manual methods, and linear reporting. Then came LLMs, which helped summarise results or automate small parts of analysis.&nbsp; Agentic AI goes further.It doesn’t wait for instructions. It defines the problem, fetches data, tests ideas, and refines results—all without a human in the loop at every step. For research leaders, this means your team’s value isn’t doing the work. It’s designing how the work gets done.<h2>What’s Different About Agentic AI in Research?</h2><ul><li>It decides what’s relevant: Agentic agents aren’t just retrieval bots. They weigh sources, reject irrelevant material, and pivot their search in real-time. </li><li>It iterates autonomously: You give it a goal (e.g. "Find emerging risks in climate finance"), and it cycles through plans, tests prompts, filters noise, and narrows in on insights. </li><li>It stops itself: Based on thresholds you set, it knows when to finish. No more over-researching or half-done threads.</li></ul>This moves research from a task-based job to a system-level challenge.<h2>What Should Research Leaders Do Now?</h2>If your team writes 40-page reports or spends weeks on literature reviews, that structure needs rethinking.Instead:<ul><li>Redesign workflows around agents, not people </li><li>Focus on quality thresholds, risk settings, and escalation triggers </li><li>Use no-code tools to prototype agent workflows without relying on dev teams </li></ul>Don’t wait until a competitor publishes in half the time with better source coverage.<h2>Example: Agentic Research in Action</h2>A policy advisory firm built an agentic research assistant to monitor regulatory updates across Southeast Asia.The old method:<ol><li>4 researchers </li><li>Manual checks of 25 sites </li><li>3-day lag for compilation </li></ol>The new setup:<ol><li>An agent triggers daily scans </li><li>Uses LLMs to translate, tag, and flag high-risk changes </li><li>Escalates only what matters to a human reviewer</li></ol>It cut workload by 60%, reduced turnaround to 6 hours, and improved accuracy.<h2>The Real Shift: From Analysts to System Architects</h2>Research professionals won’t disappear but their skillset will change.You’ll need:<ul><li>A grip on AI agents and how to prompt them </li><li>The ability to structure a research question for machine execution </li><li>Skills to build guardrails and validate outputs </li></ul>That’s what you learn in our <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">AI Fundamentals Masterclass</a> and develop in the <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/introduction-to-ai-5-day-bootcamp">AI Bootcamp</a>. We teach non-technical teams to turn workflows into agent-ready systems.<h2>&nbsp;FAQ</h2>Q: Is agentic AI safe to use for critical research? A: Yes, but only with strong guardrails. Define scope, escalation points, and review logic to ensure responsible use.Q: Do I need a data science team to use this? A: No. Many agentic tools are no-code or low-code. Most of our clients use Airtable, Make, or Claude with structured prompt flows.Q: What’s the first step to redesigning our research process? A: Start with a Readiness Assessment. We’ll map your existing workflow and show you where agents can save time or improve quality.Ready to start? Run your Readiness Assessment or join the next <a data-mce-href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass" href="https://aistrategyconsulting.com.au/ai-fundamentals-masterclass">Masterclass.</a> &nbsp;

How Agentic AI Is Rewriting the Rules of Market Research

AI strategy consulting