GPT-5 Model Card Explained: The AI “Food Label” for Explainability

TLDR: A model card is like a food label for AI, it lists what’s inside, how it was tested, and how to use it safely. OpenAI’s GPT-5 System Card shows major gains over GPT-4 in coding, reasoning, and factual accuracy, plus a steep drop in hallucinations and deceptions. For business leaders, these scores aren’t just technical stats: they’re evidence for AI governance, ISO 42001 compliance, and risk-based deployment. This blog explains what a model card is, why it matters, what GPT-5’s benchmarks mean in practice, and how to use them to make responsible AI adoption decisions.

What a Model Card Is (and Why It Matters)

If you’ve never heard of a model card, think of it as a nutrition panel for AI.
Food labels tell you the ingredients, nutritional value, allergens, and safe storage. A model card does the same for an AI system:

• What the model can do.
  
• Where it performs well and where it fails.
  
• How it was tested and evaluated.
  
• What safeguards are built in.
  

This is essential for AI governance because it gives decision-makers a structured, documented view of the system before it’s deployed. Under ISO 42001 AI management systems, having this information isn’t optional it’s a fundamental part of responsible AI management. Yes, even if you use ChatGPT to help with emails or marketing.

The Purpose of GPT-5’s Model Card

OpenAI’s GPT-5 System Card is intended for a broad audience: researchers, regulators, enterprise buyers, and anyone building on the model. It provides:

1. Capabilities — Areas where GPT-5 is strong, such as coding, reasoning, and multi-step tasks.
   
2. Limitations — Known failure modes, reduced but still present hallucinations, and constraints in open-ended creativity.
   
3. Safeguards — Filters, monitoring, and policies for responsible deployment.
   
4. Testing methods — Benchmarks, stress tests, and real-world scenario evaluations.
    

GPT-5’s Documented Capabilities with Benchmark Results

The GPT-5 model card highlights key strengths, backed by benchmark data:

Headline improvements over GPT-4 and GPT-4o:

• Hallucination reduction: 26% fewer typical-use hallucinations than GPT-4o; over 60% lower in “thinking” mode compared to reasoning-optimised models.
  
• Coding: Best-in-class performance across competitive programming benchmarks, outperforming Claude 4.1 and GPT-4.
  
• Reasoning: Higher ARC-Challenge scores, indicating stronger structured logic and problem-solving.
  
• Factual accuracy: Below 1% hallucination rate in complex, fact-seeking prompts (LongFact, FActScore).
  
• Language comprehension: Improved context retention and complex document handling.
  

What this means for you:

• Fewer hours wasted checking AI-assisted work.
  
• More credible AI-generated recommendations for reports, tenders, or compliance submissions.
  
• Safer deployment in compliance-sensitive workflows like policy summaries or regulatory filings.
   

Known Limitations You Need to Know

The GPT-5 System Card is clear on where the model still falls short:

• Perfect accuracy is impossible — Even with reduced hallucinations, errors still occur and require human review.
  
• Bias and fairness risks remain — The model reflects patterns and imbalances from its training data.
  
• Domain gaps — Performance drops in niche or novel subject areas.
  
• Creative output quality — Still weaker at producing consistently high-quality long-form creative writing.
  

What this means for you:

• Use GPT-5 in low- to medium-risk workflows first.
  
• Keep human oversight in decision-critical processes.
  
• Avoid deploying in sensitive contexts without rigorous in-domain testing.
   

  Safeguards and Responsible Use

The system card outlines safeguards built into GPT-5:

• Content moderation filters — Preventing unsafe or harmful outputs.
  
• Usage monitoring — Detecting risky behaviour patterns.
  
• Policy enforcement — Restricting high-risk uses through terms of service.
  
• Transparency — Publishing benchmark and testing results.
  

Governance takeaway: Under ISO 42001 AI management systems, vendor safeguards should be matched with internal controls like:

• Human-in-the-loop review.
  
• Documented AI risk assessments.
  
• Regular internal audits.
   

  How to Use a Model Card in Your Organisation

Reading a model card isn’t academic—it’s operational. You should:

• Include it in your AI risk register — Document strengths, weaknesses, and safeguards.
  
• Match benchmarks to your use cases — Deploy only where the data supports your needs.
  
• Integrate into procurement — Require model cards from all AI vendors.
  
• Train your teams — Ensure relevant staff can read and interpret these documents.
   

  Why This Links to ISO 42001

ISO 42001 is the global standard for AI management systems. It demands evidence-based governance and model cards are exactly that evidence.

• Clause 8.2 — Operational controls for AI systems.
  
• Clause 9.1 — Documented evaluation of AI performance and risks.
  
• Clause 10.2 — Continuous improvement based on new evidence.
  

A model card like GPT-5’s gives you structured, vendor-provided information to meet these requirements.

FAQ

Q: What is a model card in AI?
A: A governance document describing an AI system’s capabilities, limitations, benchmark scores, and safeguards—similar to a food label for packaged products.

Q: How does GPT-5 compare to GPT-4?
A: GPT-5 outperforms GPT-4 in reasoning, coding, and factual accuracy, with significantly lower hallucination and deception rates.

Q: Why is this relevant for my business?
A: It helps you identify safe, efficient, and compliant use cases for GPT-5.

Q: How does this link to ISO 42001 compliance?
A: Model cards provide documented evidence for AI performance monitoring, operational controls, and risk assessments—core ISO 42001 elements.

Q: Do benchmarks replace real-world testing?
A: No. They guide deployment decisions but should be followed by in-context trials.

Build Your AI Compliance Advantage Before It’s Required

AI ISO 42001 AIMS Certification — Build a compliant AI management system aligned with global standards.
AI Fundamentals Masterclass — Learn the building blocks of AI systems and their governance.
AI Strategy Roadmap — Plan safe, strategic AI adoption using benchmark evidence.
AI Business Case Workshop — Quantify ROI and risk before deploying AI into critical processes.